1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
mina [271]
3 years ago
8

Italian states like Venice and Florence were officially republics. In what sense were they republics in name only

History
2 answers:
Ulleksa [173]3 years ago
7 0
Since the Venetians were gentlemen in name rather than reality.
Rzqust [24]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

The states of Venice, Milan and Florence, although officially independent republics, were only so in name, rather than in fact, because although they possesed the characteristics of a republic: a constitution, limitation of power in the hands of one person, and popular vote, the truth was that these characteristics appeared only on paper, and not in truth.

Explanation:

During the Renaissance period, at the beginning of the 15th century, several of the city-states in the Italian Peninsula formed as independent entities, rather than as one bigger nation. Their power came from their merchant families, like the Medici in Florence, and from their power in commerce, banking, and other such activities. Although these states were considered republics because they were not governed by a single ruler, had a constitution, and the people had a right to vote, the truth was that these characteristics, especially the last two, only applied to titled, wealthy and educated people; not to the commoners. Thus, in reality, Florence, Milan and Venice were republics in word, but not in fact.

You might be interested in
This early map of New England was published in 1677.
Bas_tet [7]

Answer:

D

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
Give a .brief argument in favor of the ratification of the Treaty of Versailles
Charra [1.4K]

Answer:

Although the treaty of Versailles did lead to the second world war, there are some parts of it which did make sense.

Answer below:

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The Treaty of Versailles will force the responsible nations to pay something to the nations they affected. For example, Germany was stripped of some of its lands and all of its overseas colonies. Germany was also forced to pay 33 billion US dollars. This helped pacify the neighboring countries by making it so that they would gain something for all that they lost. Also, the Treaty attempted to prevent a second World War by making Germany have a troop limit and making them unable to use any military technology such as tanks or planes.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

To be completely honest, the answer I gave you is true for the people who made the Treaty, but not for the people who saw its aftermath. The Treaty of Versailles caused in some part the Great Depression of Germany because it forced them to rely on American loans to pay off their debt. It also garnered hostility from the Germans since they took away their lands like the Rhineland and the Sudetenland. It was a catastrophic mistake in part of the allies.

8 0
3 years ago
are these two questions right?
Julli [10]

Explanation:

Yes

#1

Option C

  • Capitalism is modern eras economy
  • This was established and ruled out by US and western allies.
  • They fought with Russia and communism

#2

Option B

  • As reformation of labour laws will pull some requirements of labors
4 0
2 years ago
The main idea behind the settling of western lands by Americans in the early 1800s was known as
schepotkina [342]
Manifest destiny- the settlers believed God had given them the duty to settle and 'civilise' American land.
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
When historians say they try to be objective this means all of the following EXCEPT:
ohaa [14]

When historians say they try to be objective this means all of the following EXCEPT:

A. They use their own personal opinions to better explain the evidence. (They do not use their own personal opinions as that wouldn't make it objective)

B. They do not go beyond what the evidence indicates. (This stating they do not guess and/or fill in what they believe)

C. They present facts rather than falsehoods. (Facts do make it objective)

D. They use reliable evidence. (They have to use reliable evidence to make it factual)


The only reasonable answer is A.

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Where did Robert E. Lee invade when general george mcClellan was forced to retreat near richmond
    5·1 answer
  • Who benefited the most from imperialism, Africa or India? Why?
    11·2 answers
  • Eighteenth amendment to the united states constitution "after one year from the ratification of this article the manufacture, sa
    6·1 answer
  • Help please !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    5·1 answer
  • Which powers did the pope hold over medieval monarchs select all that apply
    12·1 answer
  • The main idea of nullification was that _____.
    6·2 answers
  • What is superposition?
    5·2 answers
  • Mrs. Geist is working with her class to find out why some people live longer than others. Which assignment would
    7·1 answer
  • For the next following questions identify the thinker of the Enlightenment that
    7·1 answer
  • Why did Mexico open its borders to American settlers in the early 1800s?
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!