1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
mina [271]
3 years ago
8

Italian states like Venice and Florence were officially republics. In what sense were they republics in name only

History
2 answers:
Ulleksa [173]3 years ago
7 0
Since the Venetians were gentlemen in name rather than reality.
Rzqust [24]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

The states of Venice, Milan and Florence, although officially independent republics, were only so in name, rather than in fact, because although they possesed the characteristics of a republic: a constitution, limitation of power in the hands of one person, and popular vote, the truth was that these characteristics appeared only on paper, and not in truth.

Explanation:

During the Renaissance period, at the beginning of the 15th century, several of the city-states in the Italian Peninsula formed as independent entities, rather than as one bigger nation. Their power came from their merchant families, like the Medici in Florence, and from their power in commerce, banking, and other such activities. Although these states were considered republics because they were not governed by a single ruler, had a constitution, and the people had a right to vote, the truth was that these characteristics, especially the last two, only applied to titled, wealthy and educated people; not to the commoners. Thus, in reality, Florence, Milan and Venice were republics in word, but not in fact.

You might be interested in
An early traveler to china was:<br><br> A. Prince Henry<br> B.Marco Polo<br> C.Vasco da Gama
Dimas [21]
An early traveler to China was B. Marco Polo
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What purpose do the Obelisk of Senusret and other obelisks serve?
Oksanka [162]
I believe the answer is Acting as conduits for gods
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
WHO<br> is being sent to complete<br> works of death and<br> desolation?<br> help
ASHA 777 [7]

Answer:

me i need helpopppppppppp

8 0
3 years ago
According to Thomas Hobbes’s concept of the social contract , what do people exchange for protection by the government?
Fynjy0 [20]

<u>Answer:</u>  Hobbes believed people exchange their <u>personal liberty</u>  for protection and security under a government.

<u>Explanation/detail:</u>

Thomas Hobbes published a famous work called <em>Leviathan</em> in 1651.  The title "Leviathan" comes from a biblical word for a great and mighty beast.  Hobbes believed government is formed by people for the sake of their personal security and stability in society.  In Hobbes view, once the people put a king (or other leader in power), then that leader needs to have supreme power (like a great and mighty beast).    Hobbes' view of the natural state of human beings without a government held that people are too divided and too volatile as individuals -- everyone looking out for his own interests.  So for security and stability, authority and the power of the law needs to be in the hands of a powerful ruler like a king or queen.  And so people willingly enter a "social contract" in which they live under a government that provides stability and security for society.

Probably the most famous set of lines from Hobbes' <em>Leviathan </em>book describes what he saw as the natural state of human affairs without government -- one in which every individual had freedom, but that meant it was a situation of "war of all against all," or we might say, every man for himself.  Hobbes wrote:

  • <em>In such condition, there is no place for industry; because the fruit thereof is uncertain: and consequently no culture of the earth; no navigation, nor use of the commodities that may be imported by sea; no commodious building; no instruments of moving, and removing, such things as require much force; no knowledge of the face of the earth; no account of time; no arts; no letters; no society; and which is </em><em>worst of all, continual fear, and danger of violent death; and the life of man, solitary, poor, nasty, brutish, and short.</em>
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What factors led to the start of the Industrial Revolution?
grigory [225]

Answer:

the answer is I forgotsvdbdhsuwuauaua

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • The ruler who first tried to westernize Europe was
    11·1 answer
  • Has the U.S. had more democratic or republican presidents?
    14·2 answers
  • Deforestation arvolves the widespread clearing of
    5·2 answers
  • In the early years of the Cold War United States foreign policy was dedicated to containing
    10·1 answer
  • In the 1840s, relations between American Indians and Oregon Trail travelers were mostly
    11·2 answers
  • Which if the following can be infered about the federal intervention that ended the 1894 pullman strike?
    13·1 answer
  • Why did king leonidas disobey the councils vote in the movie 300?
    6·1 answer
  • The picture is in the image
    12·1 answer
  • Chapter 11, Section 2 - Terms and Names
    15·1 answer
  • Isa ito sa maituturing na mahalagang ambag ng mga Amerikano sa sistemang pangkabuhayan ng mga Pilipino.
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!