Answer:
The Supreme Court has ruled that executive privilege is part of being president. However, executive privilege is limited.
The Supreme Court case that ruled on this was US vs. Nixon. During this time, Richard Nixon was being put on trial for his possible ties to the Watergate scandal. When this issue was brought to court, the courts demanded phone conversations that were taped from the president. However, Nixon said that he did not have to give up these tapes because they were part of his "executive privilege." The Supreme Court did not agree with Nixon.
The Supreme Court ruled that nobody is above the law and that presidents cannot use this idea to simply escape punishment.
3
Explanation:
google
Because Spain is stupid of course
Hello!
Answer:
<span>marks a major social, economic, or political shift.
Have a nice day!
</span>
They countered it because they ruined the land in every way possible which made it hard even for their allies from South Vietnam to support them. Napalm just burnt down forests and habituated areas and harmed a lot of civilians directly, while things such as agent orange destroyed the environment and poisoned the ground, the waters, the food, and basically anything else. It caused much more harm to the people than it did to help them.
Before the Turner<span> rebellion, a free African-</span>American<span> by the name of </span>Denmark Vesey<span> planned a major uprising in Charleston, South Carolina for 1822.</span>
