The comparison between the historical fiction and historical non-fiction can be described as follows:
- Meaning
- Characters
- Occurrence
<h3>What is meant by history?</h3>
History describes those events which had already occurred in the past times of ancient eras.
Historical fiction and historical non-fiction can be differentiated as follows:
- The historical fiction writes in the historical era whereas historical nonfiction is the one that may or may not be based on historical events that occurred in ancient times.
- The characters in historical fiction are being created on an imaginary basis but the nonfictional characters already existed in historical eras.
- The occurrence of historical fiction relates to past times but the no fiction historical need not necessarily belong to ancient times.
Therefore, the difference between Historical fiction and non-fiction has been explained above.
Learn more about the fiction story in the related link:
brainly.com/question/19202814
#SPJ1
Social Darwinism was used to justify imperialism. The main idea behind Social Darwinism is that the strongest and fittest survive. ... The imperialists believed their culture, their way of life, their government, and their economic system were the best.
Answer:
Así, al final, el emperador romano, con su guardia y su casa, gobernando un imperio explotado para llenar su tesoro, era esencialmente indistinguible de esos jefes bárbaros con los que chocaba.
Los romanos siempre habían despreciado a los "bárbaros" y creían que las tierras de los bárbaros (como Escocia y Alemania) eran en gran medida inadecuadas para la civilización, por ser demasiado frías y húmedas para el tipo de agricultura mediterránea a la que estaban acostumbrados los romanos.
Answer:
Great Britain.
Explanation:
The foregoing is an excerpt from Thomas Paine's prose on the separation of the United State of America from the "whims and caprices" of Great Britain. The prose emphasized that the relationship between England and America at that time was unequally yoked, and this was not meant to be. The author was of the view that there was an urgent need for separation of the two countries. According to him, even nature supports his argument, considering the proximity between the two countries and the time both countries were discovered.
