<span>Zahra
is an employee at colorz inc. she loves gossiping about her colleagues
during office hours, which causes her to receive a reprimand by her
supervisor, dan. a few days later, dan fires gunther, another
subordinate, from work for a similar reason. the employees reporting to
dan are most likely to conclude he demonstrates a lack of outcome fairness in
dealing with employees who gossip at work.
</span><span>Outcome fairness is a judgment that the consequences given to employees are just.</span>
Answer and Explanation:
Respected Sir,
Sub: Absorption costing to analyze product costs and subsequent cost-volume-profit decisions
As per your requirement please find the explanation below:
Absorption costing is a process by which we add part of the fixed overhead to the production expense of the goods. If we do on a per-unit basis. Here we will compute by dividing the fixed costs by the number of units that we built and sold over the era. Whereas Variable costing includes fixed overhead as a lump sum instead of a per-unit price.
Under this process, all your variable costs like equipment, raw materials, and shipping are included. We will add the maximum fixed overhead costs for the duration. Such costs are not calculated on a per-unit basis. Rather than we deduct them as a lump-sum expense from your income amount.
Variable costing is really useful as it reveals the earnings after all the expenses are paid for the accounting period. While you would not have earned revenue for the goods we purchased as some may be in the inventory, we are showing you have paid all of your expenses for the time. We have excess revenue when you actually sell the finished goods in the warehouse.
The absorption approach is not all that effective as absorption costing will inflate the income figures excessively in any given span of accounting. Since you're not going to subtract any of your fixed costs as we did not sell any of us produced goods, our profit and loss report doesn't reflect the maximum expenses you've had for the time. Therefore, these results may mislead us when our profitability is analyzed.
Regards
ABC
Answer:
$8,000 bc (AGIx30%)- contributions
if this is a multiple choice question post the choices and i will tell you the corrrect one. thanks
Answer:
The answer is: There was no consumer surplus in this situation.
Explanation:
consumer surplus refers to the difference between the maximum amount a consumer is willing to pay for a good or service and the actual price of the good or service.
In this case there was no consumer surplus, since Stacey was willing to pay only $2 for a bottle of mineral water and its price was $2.25, so she didn't buy it.
Answer:
70.83%
Explanation:
Given that,
Company's assets = $1,200
Equity = $350
Dept = Reported assets - Company's equity
= $1,200 - $350
= $850
Dept ratio = (Debt ÷ Total assets) × 100
= ($850 ÷ $1,200) × 100
= 0.7083 × 100
= 70.83%
Therefore, the Dept ratio of Converse Florists & Co. is 70.83%.
