Answer:
False.
Explanation:
The given assertion proffers a false claim as it incorrectly defines the communication displayed by Margaret through arranging a 'multiparty text chatting session with her quality managers and supervisors' as 'asynchronous communication'. <u>This situation rather exemplifies a 'synchronous communication' as they all have been invited to a single platform to discuss the things face-to-face in real-time without the use of any external signal</u>. All the participants are substantially involved in the process of communication. Therefore, the given statement is asserting a <u>false</u> definition.
You are your freind is absolutely right
Answer: D
Explanation: hope this helps!
D. <em>uncharitable</em>.
The suffix <em>-able</em>, borrowed from Old French and originally from the Latin <em>-ābilis</em> (meaning "worthy of being acted upon"), can have different meanings.
The most common one is "fit/liable to be (done)," as in:
- <em>likeable</em> - fit to be liked
- <em>washable</em> - fit to be washed
- <em>degradable</em> - liable to be degraded.
This, however, does not apply to <em>comfortable</em>. Another meaning of <em>-able</em>, however, is "giving, or inclined to," as in:
- <em>comfortable</em> - giving comfort
- <em>(un)charitable</em> - (not) inclined to charity.