The French revolution and Napoleonic wars diverted attention of Spain from its colonies leaving a vacuum and increasing dissatisfaction and desire for local government.
<u>Explanation</u>:
The Mexican War of Independence took place in different regions of the Spanish colony of New Spain in several distinct phases. Mexican war was started to end the Spanish rule in Mexico.
The Mexican War was led by Miguel Hidalgo y Costilla. Creole priest invited the Mexicans to fight for independence. French revolution and Napoleonic wars affected the fight for Mexican War of Independence.
The Napoleonic Wars led by Napoleon was the major battle opposing the French Empire and its allies.
You don’t have a picture of the homework?
Answer:
Sorry, but your answer is not a question and therefore, I cannot answer it. Please add something to make it a question. For example, is it a True or False question? IS the question incomplete?
You're answers would be A, C and E
I don't really understand the difference between these two, politically, culturally, and economically. All I know between the two is that the Roman Republic are for the citizens of Rome. However, the Roman Empire is ruled by a Emperors. Now, the connotations of emperors are considered bad I think. But isn't Marcus Aurelius and Augustus very good leaders. Does anyone have some insight on how Roman R and Roman E differ from each other.
