The denotation is the literal meaning, so D. is the answer.
The first choice is the right response: The allusion emphasizes President Eisenhower's intense distaste for the governor and demonstrates his readiness to have him removed from office.
<h3>What was Jackie Robinson’s letter?</h3>
Robinson had grown increasingly frustrated with President Eisenhower's perceived lack of significant action to eradicate prejudice. He expresses his anger in this letter and requests that the President finally commit the Federal Government to advance black civil rights.
The complete question is :
How does the mention of Governor Faubus in Jackie Robinson’s letter to President Eisenhower strengthen the main argument of the letter?
- The reference highlights President Eisenhower’s deep dislike of the governor and shows his willingness to remove him from office.
- Robinson notes that Governor Faubus spoke during the Summit Meeting of Negro Leaders and became a symbol of civil rights.
- Robinson uses Governor Faubus as a metaphor for racial segregation and therefore provides a strong visual image.
- The reference provides a real-life example of a pro-segregationist and his actions, making the need for civil rights direr.
Hence, option 1 is correct about Jackie Robinsons' letter to the president.
Learn more about Jackie Robinsons:
brainly.com/question/20122399
#SPJ1
Erosional land forms such as valley's and canyons. Or depositional land forms such as floodplains, alluvial fans, and deltas.
Answer:
selected
Explanation:
plz mark me brainliest hope this helps
Answer:
It gives new ideas to achieve
Explanation:
Science fiction fascinates me. Science does not. Technology does. Combining all of them is one of the most interesting things to learn about. When an author of science fiction writes about an idea, like the idea of retina scanners, or holographic computers, it interests people, making them think, maybe we could bring this to reality. And then they do. Humans can do just about anything, and when they're interested in a topic, they're twice as likely to take it into legitimate consideration.
Hence, why we now have so many things that were nonsense years ago. Because science fiction is new, and science fiction is the future. If you told someone seventy years ago that one day we'd have self driving cars, they'd think you were nuts. Now they exist. Because some author came up with it, some CEO or millionaire though it was a good idea and told their employees to make it happen, and some engineer and/or scientist was smart enough to make it happen.
Hope this answers your question :)
<em>Stay Cold,</em>
<em>Brook</em>
