I believe that the answer is b
Answer:
The british expelled the french from nova scotia on account of the French acadian war, and british military campaign against New France.
Explanation:
From 1755-1764 the british expelled the acadian people- acadia was a colony of France- as part of the war campaign against the French. New France was a French- colonized area in North America, which was entrenched in war against the british, which resulted in the deportation of the acadian people to the rest of the thirteen colonies and to France.
Please do not copy word for word, you WILL need to rephrase everything I say in your OWN WORDS.
The executive branch and the legislative branch are two complete different things, and both have different jobs. The executive branch enforces the laws, and legislative creates the laws. It's a question to be reckoned with-- Who was going to enforce laws between the north and south? The executive branch. Of course, the legislator is the reason it passed, but they cannot enforce any laws, they cannot hold trials, they only lead it up into the Judicial branch. To put this bluntly, someone needed to enforce it.
I could not be entirely correct, as I'm going based off what I know of the reconstructive plans, and the government branches. If you care to knowledge me more on what the reconstruction plans, I could possibly change it up and put it towards a more accurate response.
I believe it’s D
Sorry if i’m wrong, but have a great day!:)
I would give him a score of about 5 out of 1.<span>He greatly democratized the process of elections in that era and was our first grassroots president. However, Jackson usually did what Jackson wanted to do, even if it meant alienating many of the people who got him elected. He did not side with Southerners during the nullification crisis and was prepared to use troops against South Carolina to enforce a law that most Southerners hated. He blatantly ignored John Marshall’s decision in Worcester v. Georgia, but an argument could be made here that he was acting in favor of democracy in this case, as most white Southerners probably wanted the Cherokee moved off of their land. He was a very complex and fascinating guy, but his critics called him King Andrew for a reason.</span>0.
