Answer:
Confining Jews to Ghettos
Explanation:
or making them brand themselves through forcing them to wear stars of david on their clothes
The two countries are Canada and the United States since Alaska is in the Arctic Ocean
Answer: Allowing interstate commerce to be dominated by powerful monopolies.
Explanation:
Here's the complete question:
All who recall the condition of the country in 1890 will remember that . . . the country was in real danger from another kind of slavery . . . that would result from the aggregations of capital in the hands of a few individuals and (businesses) controlling, for their own profit and advantage exclusively, the entire business of the country, including the production and sale of the necessaries of life." —Supreme Court Justice John Marshall Harlan, 1911
In this excerpt, Justice Harlan is warning against —
John Marshall Harlan, was an associate justice of the Supreme Court of the United States from from 1877 till when he died in 1911.
In this excerpt, Justice Harlan is warning against allowing interstate commerce to be dominated by powerful monopolies.
He believes that when interstate commerce is left in the hands of few, powerful individuals, it is a form of slavery as the businesses will only look to extort the people and make more profit and do things that'll only be beneficial to them.
Answer:
The English Bill of Rights
Explanation:
The Glorious Revolution was when William of Orange took the English throne from James II in 1688. The event brought a permanent realignment of power within the English constitution. A more contentious argument is that the constitutional changes made property rights more secure and thus promoted economic development.
The English Bill of Rights (1689) was drawn up by Parliament and signed by William and Mary in 1689. The bill was conceived to ensure that the power of the monarchy would be, in the future, limited and that Parliament could function free from royal interference.
William and Mary proclaimed joint sovereigns of Britain. The Bill of Rights, which greatly limited royal power and broadened constitutional law, granted Parliament control of finances and the army and prescribed the future line of royal succession, declaring that no Roman Catholic would ever be sovereign of England.
