Answer:
This situation means that resources were not being efficiently used.
If society managed to produce 1 more unit of X with the same resources and technology, this means that some resources were idle in the past, which causes inefficiency.
This also means that the combination 3 units of X and 4 units of Y is a point inside the PPF. However, we do not know if the combination 4 units of X and 4 units of Y is a point inside the PPF, or on the PPF, because there could be some other combination that could be even more efficient (for example 5 units of both X and Y with the same resources and technology).
This one would be IRS.
For example, if<span> you end up paying for personal property taxes to your local government, the IRS would allow you to claim a deduction for it on your federal tax return~</span>
Answer:
We expect investment spending to increase by $ 1 billion
Explanation:
If investment decreases by $ 1 billion if a 1 % change is made then that is sensitivity of investment to change in interest rate. Thus if there is a 1 % reduction in interest rate we expect to see a $ 1 billion increase in spending if this holds true.
Answer:
orange juice 0.80 dollar
Bagel 1 dollar
coffe 0.60 dollar
Explanation:
We construct the equation system:
We subtract one from another to get an expression without C:
1.5A+1.2B+C - (A+B+C) = 3 - 2.40
0.5A + 0.2B = 0.6
Then, we solve in the first part to express B as an expression of A
considering the coffe is worth half of the new cost of A
C = 1.5A / 2 = 0.75A
A + B + C = 2.40
A + B + 0.75A = 2.40
B = 2.40 - 1.75A
And now we replace in the other expression to get A:
0.5A + 0.2(2.40 - 1.75A) = 0.6
0.5A - 0.35A + 0.48 = 0.60
0.15A = 0.12
A = 0.12/0.15 = 0.8
Now we solve for C:
C = 0.75A = 0.6
Last, for B:
A + B + C = 2.40
0.8 + B + 0.6 = 2.40
B = 2.40 - 0.8 - 0.6 = 1
Answer:
lets look at the options and find the correct one!
obviously technology is not related to this at all. so we can cut it off.
Operations is not applicable as an answer as well. it doesn't seem to fit in.
Structure and executive pay are two different things so nope! not that one!
d. people this option is a bit confusing so lets keep it for now.
e. social responsibility seems like fits in too as the government money saves these companies, the companies have a responsibility to have a fair pay towards their executives.
but as the question asks "example of an organization change attempt focused on influencing", in my view the most suitable one would be PEOPLE since the Politicians, tax payers and news media are all trying to do this by influencing people.
Explanation:
