3 years ago

In which way did the 2013 Supreme Court ruling dilute the Voting Rights Act ?

History

1 answer:

otez555 [7]3 years ago

7 0

Answer:

Nine states with racial discrimination histories no longer need to submit plans to the government for approval.

Explanation:

On June 25 2013, the United States Supreme Court vote against the Section 4 of the 1965 Voting Rights Act. The section 4 which requires a stringent means for nine states with racial discrimination histories to submit plans to the government for approval. However, with the 2013 ruling by the Supreme Court, the requirements will no longer be needed.

Hence, this particular ruling diluted the voting right act of 1965.

You might be interested in

How did Louis XIV rule

slamgirl [31]

He was a an absolute ruler

3 0

3 years ago

According to Xenophon, what values governed Spartan life?

Nat2105 [25]

In ancient Sparta strength was admired and weakness was despised. The greatest virtue was bravery and the greatest honor was to die fighting in battle. The most serious crime for a Spartan was to retreat from battle.

7 0

3 years ago

The band that played at national FFA conventions was originally called what?

Ivahew [28]

Answer:

mail order band

Explanation:

4 0

3 years ago

How does the manufacturing of the United States compare to that of india/Pakistan from 1800 to 1900

Marina CMI [18]

Relations between India and Pakistan have been complex and largely hostile due to a number of historical and political events. Relations between the two states have been defined by the violent partition of British India in 1947, the Kashmir conflict and the numerous military conflicts fought between the two nations.

8 0

3 years ago

Agree or disagree? one piece of historical evidence, along with explanation and analysis as needed.

anzhelika [568]

Answer:

Agree

Explanation:

Hopefully this helps!

3 0

3 years ago