1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Vitek1552 [10]
3 years ago
15

In which way did the 2013 Supreme Court ruling dilute the Voting Rights Act ?

History
1 answer:
otez555 [7]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

Nine states with racial discrimination histories no longer need to submit plans to the government for approval.

Explanation:

On June 25 2013, the United States Supreme Court vote against the Section 4 of the 1965 Voting Rights Act. The section 4 which requires a stringent means for nine states with racial discrimination histories to submit plans to the government for approval. However, with the 2013 ruling by the Supreme Court, the requirements will no longer be needed.

Hence, this particular ruling diluted the voting right act of 1965.

You might be interested in
Which of these statements best explains the role of the colonies in the Trans-Atlantic trade system? A. The colonies sent slaves
Alex_Xolod [135]

Pretty sure the answer is D

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Who is allowed to ask the nominee questions under oath
lyudmila [28]

Answer:id remember

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
Canada has 10 provinces that share power with the central government. Which of the following terms best describes this character
Vikentia [17]
<span>Federation. A federation is a type of government with a cental government system as well as separate states or provinces with representative power in the central government. Canada is similar to the United States in their government construction with Canada having provinces and the US having a states. </span>
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What does this cartoon suggest about Congress and campaign finance reform?
aleksley [76]
I think the answer to that would be B. 

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What is the significance of the English Bill of Rights on the development of the U.S Constitution?
guapka [62]

Some believed that the Constitution did not give the new federal government the ability to restrict inherent rights, so no list of those rights was necessary. Others worried that if the rights were listed, they would invariably forget some and the list would ever be incomplete. Finally, the argument was that the states each had their own constitutions, too, and that rights were best protected at a state level.

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which of the following statements is an accurate description of how social contract theory influenced the structure of American
    6·1 answer
  • What is the capital of Africa ????
    5·2 answers
  • How did America's involvement in World War II impact race relations in the military?
    9·1 answer
  • The Red Cross The Red Crescent Greenpeace Amnesty International Doctors Without Borders All of these are examples of
    7·2 answers
  • Take a few moments to reflect on what you have learned about the U.S. Constitution. Write a brief reflection about what you cons
    8·1 answer
  • Which of the following tribes were members of the Five Civilized Tribes? Select all that apply.
    15·1 answer
  • What is one major factor that can result in biased news stories? A. Payments from political parties B. Pressure from media execu
    15·1 answer
  • Why did no great empires develop to the north of mesoamerica?
    13·1 answer
  • What was the Holocaust? What type of government was in effect in Germany at the time of the Holocaust?
    5·2 answers
  • The idea of actively reading historical material and then interpreting it into your ideas about its thesis and evidence was iden
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!