What is worcester vs georgia

1 answer:

5 0

Worcester v. Georgia, 31 U.S. 515, was a case in which the United States Supreme Court vacated the conviction of Samuel Worcester and held that the Georgia criminal statute that prohibited non-Native Americans from being present on Native American lands without a license from the state was unconstitutional.

You might be interested in

Many Egyptians loved perfume, and Egypt imported some of the finest perfumes. A. Yes B. No

andrey2020 [161]

A)Yes,because observers found that the aroma was similar to coconut oil.It was imported from Nepal to Egypt and was used as folk medicine.(i dont even know how that is possible)hope this helps

5 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Which of the following statements is accurate regarding the practice of terracing in ancient Athens?

Harrizon [31]

Terracing worked best in areas with large plains.
Terracing was so effective in ancient Athens that it produced enough food that it could be traded to other places.
The ancient Athenians used terracing to grow potatoes, corn, and squash.
Ancient Athens invented the practice of terracing.

3 0

2 years ago

Which of the following is a characteristic of a traditional economy?

Bezzdna [24]

I believe the answer is D: It revolves around the family unit.

3 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Do you think having only two parties in power in the US is good or bad for our country? Why?

Mandarinka [93]

Answer:

The goal of voting is to elect representatives by the voice of the people. However when only two parties are allowed to run, American choices are restricted by limited views and only given two choices. This restriction seems to be effective, but is simple not accomplishing the goal of electing the representatives the people actually want. This argument says that a 2 parties system is bad 

Here is another argument

While the constitution does not provide language that explicitly endorses a two party system, a great deal of its laws perpetuate their existence like the electoral college and plurality voting. The electoral college makes it virtually impossible for a third party candidate to win any given office by discouraging votes in individual states amongst other things. Likewise, plurality voting, which guarantees the candidate with the majority of votes wins, generally favors two opposing sides as time goes by. This is only made stronger by the fact that The majority of Americans seem to lean towards the right or left, with a small percentage staying in between. As long as these systems are in place, a two party system will naturally prevail. This argument says that the 2 parties system is good.

Explanation:

It's just how you look at really if you think its bad then your think its bad same goes for the person who says its good. It's just an opinion. But each side will have supporting facts and details.

7 0

2 years ago

What are "the controversial" new deal questions posited?

Keith_Richards [23]

The controversial questions are did it destroy american freedom or expand liberty

6 0

3 years ago