The correct answer for this question would be the third option. <span>In 1801, when napoleon signed an agreement called the Concordat with Pope Pius VII, the effect of the agreement is that, t</span>he church was able to function without persecution from the government. T<span>he Church agreed to give up their claim to the lost lands. The principle of religious freedom which the revolution had guaranteed remained in effect.</span>
The correct answer is limited suffrage
In a dictatorship, there is limited suffrage in that the people may be allowed to vote at certain levels but not in the presidential elections. Even when they vote, there is electoral malpractice and rigging to ensure only the cronies of the dictator win
For his own sake, no. What he did blatantly put himself in danger and finally was placed under interrogation, etc & so forth.
For the sake of science, yes. What he did, and the consequences thereof, would have publicised his struggle, especially during the age of Enlightenment. Although what he did might also have momentarily pushed people away from science in fear of the consequences of facing the church due to the harsh punishment that he was subjected to. His persistence was, in the end only healthy for the development of science in later years.
The scientist who thought that the earth was the center of the universe was Nicolas Copernicus
<span>The Chinese have good respect for their ancestors and pay homage to them with gifts and foods at alters.</span><span>
</span>