Answer:
<em>B. Yes, although it may be breached in most states if there is a court order to do so.</em>
Explanation:
<em>Duty of confidentiality is a provision that has been put in place in most states, to enable clients open up freely if they need help. This allows professionals to take whatever actions necessary to carry out full service delivery when helping the client. </em>Some of these details include health status, a client-lawyer case story, a social media's access to users' personal details, etc. The law prohibits professionals from disclosing information made available to them by the client to a third party. This duty is held by many professional bodies like the medical body, legal body, among others. <em>This duty can be broken by law in situations where the client sues the professional, or when there is a legal court order to do so</em>.
Answer:
Option C. A debit to Equipment for $620, a credit to Cash for $140, and a credit to Accounts Payable for $480.
Explanation:
The reason is that the equipment has been acquired by the business which is worth $620 and this means that the equipment which is asset in nature must be increased by it fair value which is $620. The purchase of equipment requires the payment of $140 at the spot which means that the cash asset will be reduced by $140 and the remainder $480 will be paid in future which means that the current liabilities will be increased by $480.
Increase in Equipment (fixed asset) is debited by $620.
Decrease in Cash (asset) is credited with $140.
Increase in current liability is always credited and in this case must be credited with $480.
Journal entry in nutshell is as under:
Dr Equipment $620
Cr Cash Account $140
Cr Accounts Payables $480
Full question:
In some states and localities, scalping is against the law although enforcement is spotty
A. Using supply/demand analysis and words, demonstrate what a weakly enforced antiscalping law would likely do to the price of tickets.
B. Using supply/demand analysis and words, demonstrate what a strongly enforced antiscalping law would likely do to the price of tickets
Answer and Explanation:
A. For the first scenario, a weakly enforced antiscalping law would still allow the resale of tickets as it is not enforced properly. Therefore it's effect on price would remain as though there were no laws restricting scalping( scalping: price increase created by artificial shortage and bulk resale of tickets) . See the attached diagram for the supply and demand curve and price increase as a result of a weak antiscalping law
B. For the second scenario, scalping has no effect on price as antiscalping laws are strong and therefore there is no scalping. Price remains the same and does not change.
In diagram A for first scenario price increases from p1 to p2 and quantity decreases from q1 to q2 to indicate increase in price and quantity decrease for shortage respectively. This shows the effect of scalping on the market with weak antiscalping laws
In diagram B, price and quantity remain the same to show strong antiscalping laws
A. Bias by placement, because bias by labeling would be something to the effect of calling the liberals point of view uneducated, or giving there view some negative label, bias by omission would mean completely ignoring the other side, and not covering it at all, whereas all the other ones don't really fit, bias by placement is something to the effect of airing one side in the morning, while everyone is watching, and airing the other one after everyone is asleep, which is what is done here, which we know by the sentence "<span>liberal point of view at the end."</span>
Answer:
D) Use production technologies that conserve on the number of workers.
Explanation:
