Jews of the first century had the greatest and most widespread expectation of a <u>Davidic Messiah</u>; Jews anticipate a David-lineage king who will rule Israel with righteousness and justice in the end times. And most likely the one they yearned for, who had the strength to drive away their adversaries.
As a traditional messianic title referring to the Messiah's lineage from David, "Son of David" refers to the greatest king of Israel. Many Jews in ancient Israel did not accept Jesus as the promised Messiah.
However, since the messianic figures ranged from king to priest to prophet, messianic expectations varied from one group to another. Some came to believe that the Messiah was a supernatural being.
Figure out how Jews and Christians are different in regards to messianic thought: brainly.com/question/1471002
#SPJ4
<span>a fiscal crisis in urban areas</span>
Answer:
1) Peace
2) Do you believe sustained world peace is possible? Why or why not?
Explanation:
There are two valid definitions of the word peace:
<em>Peace is a period in time without any conflicts similar to war. </em>
<em>Peace is the state of freedom that no one disturbs.</em>
<em />
World peace is possible in <u>theory</u>.
To achieve world peace all of the nations would have to relinquish dogma, religion and political beliefs.
Those are the three main reasons why people cannot have peace.
Similar topics are discussed in many Utopian books. Something similar was the main idea of communism at the beginning. In the perfect world without any conflict, everyone would have to live by the same rules, have equal rights and the same lifestyle. Still, there is a problem with this type of life and it lies in the efforts of society and individuals. For example, a person who goes to college would not have a better financial life than the person who did not go to college, thus the individual effort to stand out would be pointless.
<u>To conclude, world peace is possible in theory, but it is almost impossible to have it in practice.</u>
Answer:
Jefferson completed the Louisiana purchase even though he feared it was unconstitutional.
Explanation:
Article IV of the Constitution said new states could be added, but made no provision for taking on foreign territories.
Jefferson was concerned that the treaty powers granted to the President in the Constitution did not allow the executive branch to attain land through treaty.
Jefferson argued that a constitutional amendment was needed. ...
This purchase was needed because the President feared that if the America did purchase New Orleans from France it would eventually lead to war.
The initial intent was to only purchase New Orleans, but when the representatives returned they proposed a buy out of the entire Louisiana territory. Napoleon needed money for an impending war with England. The territory was sold to the US for $15.
True. The pact was signed August 21, 1937. It went into effect immediatly. The pact was registered with the League of Nations Treaty Series September 8, 1937.