1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
kykrilka [37]
2 years ago
13

How important do you think it is for two people to spend time together alone if they really want to get to know each other? How

important is it for two people to spend time together as part of a group if they really want to get to know each other?
History
2 answers:
FromTheMoon [43]2 years ago
6 0
Quality time with friends and family is always good for you. It gives you a better chance of getting to know them on a deeper level. Maybe you will learn new things about them that you really didn’t know before. It always good to spend quality time with people who you want close to you.
tatyana61 [14]2 years ago
3 0

Answer:

for a relationship, it would be important to know the good and bad to see if they would be someone that you would want to stay with and would not cheat on you vice versa, and as a group, it would be important to get to gather to strengthen friendships and make sure the group mentality thing doesn't happen.

You might be interested in
Define special interest groups. Explain whether you agree or disagree with their ability to influence government policy by givin
grigory [225]

Answer: Stakeholders are organizations that put pressure on political structures through various mechanisms.

Explanation:

Sometimes they do it for their own interests, and sometimes for the common good. Control of the flow of money among political entities by interest groups is a positive thing. Primarily because in this way, public money is controlled, and the transparency of the distribution of funds among political entities is increased. Through the media, stakeholders seek to achieve public goals by putting pressure on the country's political elite.

5 0
3 years ago
How did the Supreme Court case, Gibbons v. Ogden, affect interstate commerce?
Juli2301 [7.4K]

It determined that only the federal government could regulate interstate commerce.

The case of Gibbons v. Ogden regarded the interstate shipping trade and whether or not the states could regulate or if it was Congress's job to regulate.

The decision from the Marshall Court stated it was the job of Congress under the Commerce Clause to regulate trade between states to include shipping. New York was not able to regulate the trade taking place in the waterways between states. One of the justices included in a supporting decision that the federal interstate laws superseded the state laws and the federal government was the ultimate power on interstate trade.

7 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How start the clivl war
Citrus2011 [14]

Answer:

please mark me as brainlist

Explanation:

April 12, 1861

At 4:30 a.m. on April 12, 1861, Confederate troops fired on Fort Sumter in South Carolina’s Charleston Harbor. Less than 34 hours later, Union forces surrendered. Traditionally, this event has been used to mark the beginning of the Civil War. In the Senate, however, the fall of Sumter was the latest in a series of events that culminated in war.

On November 6, 1860, in an election that brought the new Republican Party to national power, Abraham Lincoln was elected president by a strictly northern vote. Four days later, on November 10, Senator James Chesnut resigned his Senate seat and returned home to South Carolina to draft an ordinance of secession. One day later, South Carolina’s James Hammond also pledged to support the Confederacy “with all the strength I have.”

In the wake of these dramatic events, the Senate convened the 2nd session of the 36th Congress on December 3, 1860. Vice President John Breckinridge presided as the Senate chaplain offered a benediction. “Hear our petitions, and send us an answer of peace,” he prayed. “May all bitterness and wrath” be put away, and may senators “deliberate . . . not as partisans, but as brethren and patriots, seeking the highest welfare . . . of the whole country . . . . Hear us . . . , and heal our land.” The clerk then called the roll. Ten southern senators failed to answer.

The secession crisis grew with each passing week, forcing the Senate to deal with vacant seats and diminishing quorums. When Mississippi voted to secede on January 9, Senator Jefferson Davis issued a warning. “If you desire at this last moment to avert civil war, so be it,” he told his colleagues. “If you will not have it thus . . . , a war is to be inaugurated the like of which men have not seen.” Six more senators were gone by the end of January, and three others left in February. Eventually, 25 of the Senate’s 66 members left to support the Confederate cause. Even Vice President Breckinridge walked out, although his state of Kentucky remained loyal to the Union.

Long before Lincoln took the oath of office, and long before those fateful shots were fired at Fort Sumter, the Senate faced its own civil war. Yet, it managed to fulfill its constitutional duties. During these months, it confirmed five cabinet secretaries and a Supreme Court justice and passed important legislation, such as the 1861 tariff bill that provided badly needed revenue. It established a Committee of Thirteen to consider peace proposals, including Senator John Crittenden’s plan to extend to the Pacific Ocean the Missouri Compromise line dividing free from slave states. Crittenden hoped for another peaceful solution, but Radical Republicans like Charles Sumner dismissed such efforts. Secession was not “merely political,” Sumner argued, it was “a revolution.” The era of compromise was gone. Crittenden’s proposal failed.

By the time Lincoln took office on March 4, 1861, rumors were circulating of a threatened Confederate attack at Fort Sumter. Northern Republicans, backed by an abolitionist press, demanded military action. “Reinforce Fort Sumter at all hazards!” became the northerners’ cry. Lincoln agreed to re-supply the fort, but with food rather than weapons. Fort Sumter fell. Now the lines were drawn, not only in the Senate, but across the nation. “Every man must be for the United States or against it,” proclaimed Senator Stephen Douglas. “There can be no neutrals in this war.”

8 0
2 years ago
How did the population of Africans grow in the colonies during the 17th century?
rodikova [14]

Answer:

These populations continued to grow at a rapid rate throughout the 18th century  made up as much as 80% of the population in Virginia in the 17th century.

hope this helped

3 0
3 years ago
explain how harding and coolidge may have addressed the causes and issues that hoover addressed too little too late
Vesna [10]
In this case, one has to check on some of the issues which had been addressed first by Hoover and later relate them and see how they could be addressed by Coolidge and Harding and the techniques used by Harding also realized hence the way to address this case . For instance, Hoover had tackled issues based on economic and social development, therefore, these are similar issues to be related to the resolving powers of Harding and Coolidge. For instance, Coolidge and Harding talked much and had a lot of approaches to solving issues, for instance they used policy approach techniques to solve such issues, for instance the economic policy that led to economic growth, growth in the constitutional government among other things, hence the way to go about this case. Explanation: In this regard, the achievements of Coolidge and Harding have been realized and therefore there is need address the issue which Hoover dealt with and refer them to how Coolidge and Harding could have dealt with them, hence the reason as to why using the policy approach to solving issues has been proposed in this case.
5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which Portuguese explorer sailed around Africa and across the Indian Ocean to reach India?
    11·1 answer
  • Which was not a principle that Jawaharial Nehru and Gandhi would have supported?
    5·2 answers
  • What was one similarity that both Judaism and christianity both had in their spread
    15·1 answer
  • The late 19th century was dominated by the "Gilded Age" and the "Progressive Era". In an essay, discuss the changing American so
    14·1 answer
  • Urgent help me please
    12·1 answer
  • Read the following amendment to the U.S. Constitution: Amendment VI: In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the r
    8·1 answer
  • What Question Would You Ask A Native American?
    8·1 answer
  • Select all that apply.
    11·2 answers
  • ________ ________ were severely curtailed by Abraham Lincoln
    8·2 answers
  • Three weaknesses of the Patriot army were:
    5·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!