The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Do you consider Bishop Eusebius’s account to be reliable?
No, really not.
The reason why because his account had created many controversies.
Eusebius has been known as the official historian of the church. He participated in the Council of Nice in 314, organized by Roman Emperor Constantine to revise the religious or historic documents that would end up being in the Bible.
So Eusebius based most of his comments on personal opinions and other historic document's interpretations. It is difficult to say that he did the proper research and had reliable sources. During the Nicea Council, a group of Bishops decided what documents had to be part of the Bible and which not, based on their own criteria. That is not a good indicator of the validity of the documents included, even less we can consider those as sacred.
Explanation:
MARVEL AVENGERS.......
sry it just a joke
The war between the United States and the Confederate States began on April 12, 1861 at Fort Sumter, Charleston, South Carolina. The immediate cause was Constitutional principle: the U.S. government refused to recognize the southern states' right to secede from the Union, and the C.S.
Answer:
The person who discovered the lost mine was Padre Phillipe La Rue and the mine was abandoned because Franciscans sent a search party to find Padre Phillipe La Rue because he wasn't reporting back to Franciscans. When Padre Phillipe La Rue saw the search party looking for him he abandoned the mine because he thought the search party was going to take over his mine and take the gold from it.
Explanation:
I think D if I’m wrong I’m so sorry