The correct answer to this open question is the following.
I am going to choose the First Amendment to the United States Constitution.
The three specific arguments in favor of why this Amendment is necessary in a democratic society are the following.
1.- One of the most important characteristics of modern democratic societies is that citizens are free. Without freedom, there is no democracy.
2.- People have their own set of belief systems and they will always have them. It is intrinsic to human nature. No matter what religion people profess, it is their right.
3.- The right to assemble in a peaceful way to exchange ideas, no matter what kind of ideas, it's part of any democratic government and society in the world.
The two arguments against why this Amendment may no longer be necessary in today's America.
1.- It is so implicit that citizens have rights that will come a day in which this value of liberty would have no need to be part of a Bill of Rights.
2.- Science and the use of logic could be a substitute for the ingraining belief that people need religion to have something to believe in. When science could be able to explain it all through the use of reason, maybe there won't be the necessity to include freedom of religion as part of the Bill of Rights.
Explanation:
<em>Since topic has not been given I am giving generalized opinion where you can add specific pointers.</em>
Respected editor,
Sub: Highlight the important factors of the stake holders
I know we all will be aware of various opinions that is prevailing among Government, business and people. Instead of satisfying one side, I have analyzed and recommending the best aspects.
Based on the opinions, I have chosen based on the below pointers:
- Will promote Nation building
- Advantages of implementing
- Challenges while implementing
- Possibility study
- Risk in implementation
So based on the above, I am recommending the following:
.....
I hope you will accept my ideas and do the needful.
Yours faithfully,
XXXX.
Answer:
A. The proposed measures would be unconstitutional. The goal of the electoral colleges was to avoid a dictatorship. However, in modern America, such concept is completely out of date. To that extent, changing the way the electoral college operates would need a change in the constitution itself.
B. The government might modify the constitution, or a section of the constitution dealing with the electoral college, to better reflect current American requirements. Our founding fathers actually proposed that the constitution be changed on a regular basis in order to accommodate these new-age principles.
C. A possible candidate would appeal to the masses and would be more population leaning than state leaning; states and cities with larger populations would receive more attention than more rural places; and more democratic and liberal leaning politicians would have a huge advantage because large cities and populations are their core demographic.
Explanation:
Americans who strongly opposed the war and believed that the United States should withdraw from it were known as hawks. The correct option among all the options given in the question is the third option. There were many people that were against this war and the government did not want people to show demonstrations against the war.
