Answer:
There are some reasons behind the political instability in Nepal.First is the volatile internal political structure. The Nepalese leaders have not been able to institutionalize the political changes and have been experimenting with different systems. The Palace was also involved in this thing.Next is the geo -political interests of India, china and the western powers. Their struggle to maintain their influence in Nepal did not allowed Nepali politics to be stable. They got involved in change of leadership and systems in Nepal so that their interests could be established. India seems to be wanting complete control over Nepali leadership and then in over the economy, hydro power, and other developmental activities. It wants Nepal to be dependent over itself and so far is successful in it. China is more concerned about Free Tibet movement. There are many Tibetan refugees in Nepal. The Western powers, with the help from India, want to utilize the Tibetan refugees for Free Tibet movement.Next is the lack of strong alternative political leadership. Nepalese people have to vote for the same inefficient political leadership every time. Also, the Nepalese voters are not willing sufficiently to change the leadership
Explanation:
Answer:
true
Explanation:
yes, it is true as product-process matrix is model used to link the product variety and volume with its life cycle process. It refer to to explain product type and its process of production. it simply 2 dimension matrix , in which change in production operation and its volume relationship is explained.
Afghanistan, China, Vietnam, and Korea
Answer: Extraordinary assumption
Explanation: Appraisal could be defined as the estimation or evaluation of an object, property or structure in other to determine either the worth, condition or nature of such property or object.
An Extraordinary assumption during appraisal means a presumption that certain unknown information exists or is a fact. It assumes a condition which is unknown to be true and as such if the information is found to be false may alter the result or conclusion of the appraisal.
Such is the scenario above, when the appariser assumes there is no leakage or contamination based merely on unknown fact.
