1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
inna [77]
3 years ago
14

How was the treatment of enslaved Africans different under English rule than it was under the rule of the Dutch?

History
2 answers:
slega [8]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

I believe that under English Rule Slavery was almost slightly more fair than the way the Dutch used their rule/power

Explanation:

The Dutch West India Company imported 11 African slaves to New Amsterdam in 1626, with the first slave auction being held in New Amsterdam in 1655.

Slavery in Great Britain existed and was recognized from before the Roman occupation until the 12th century, when chattel slavery disappeared, at least for a time, after the Norman Conquest. Former slaves merged into the larger body of serfs in Britain and no longer were recognized separately in law or custom.

labwork [276]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

The under English Rule Slavery was almost slightly more fair than the way the Dutch used their rule/power

Explanation:The Dutch West India Company imported 11 African slaves to New Amsterdam in 1626, with the first slave auction being held in New Amsterdam in 1655.

Slavery in Great Britain existed and was recognized from before the Roman occupation until the 12th century, when chattel slavery disappeared, at least for a time, after the Norman Conquest. Former slaves merged into the larger body of serfs in Britain and no longer were recognized separately in law or custom.

Hope This Answer Helps alot :D

You might be interested in
What is the meaning of distarged as its used in the sentence, from the text boston tea party eyewitness account
Lady_Fox [76]

Answer:

letting go and getting rid of something,

Explanation:

The word that is mentioned in the question is wrong and the actual word is "discharged". That being said in the following sentence from the boston tea party ...

"Others raised them to the railing and discharged their contents overboard"

The word discharged is being used to say that the individuals are letting go and getting rid of something, in this case by throwing it overboard the ship where it will be gone. In this scenario, what they are getting rid of is their content with their actions.

5 0
2 years ago
What are voters required to do
Montano1993 [528]

Vote I think is right

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Who was closely linked to the abolitionist movement
labwork [276]
The white abolitionist movement in the North was led by social reformers, especially William Lloyd Garrison, founder of the American Anti-Slavery Society, and writers such as John Greenleaf Whittier and Harriet Beecher Stowe.
6 0
3 years ago
How did nationalist feelings endanger the Austro Hungarian empire? Who has this quick check???
tester [92]
<span>The Austro-Hungarian empire was endangered by feelings of nationalism because there were multiple national groups within the empire. So fulfilling nationalist goals would mean a dividing of the empire. The mere fact that the question refers to the empire as "Austro-Hungarian" is already a strong hint of the issue. Prior to 1867, it had been known as simply the Austrian Empire, but a compromise in 1867 meant that a dual monarchy was recognized (an Austrian ruler and a Hungarian ruler). The Hungarians were given self-governing authority over their own internal affairs in their portion of the empire. Other people groups within the empire would seek their own recognition as well -- Czechs, Serbs, Croats, etc. So where nationalism was a uniting factor in regions like the Italian peninsula and the German territories north of Austria, for the Austrian empire, nationalism was a dividing force.</span>
5 0
3 years ago
7. HYPOTHESIZING<br> What might happen if Congress<br> did not have nonlegislative<br> powers?
Kitty [74]

Answer:

The non-legislative powers of Congress include the abilities to amend the constitution, approve presidential appointments, investigate matters that interfere with or impede its legislative duties, impeach officials, and choose a president if no majority winner emerges as the result of an election. therefore, if congress did NOT have these powers the president would have all control over the country, no longer giving the country any rights or giving citizens the right to run loose and break all bills and federal laws having no political structure could bring back wars, deaths and other crimes.

FORGOT SOME THINGS SORRY

YW<3

4 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • What is the function of NATO?
    11·1 answer
  • Which is NOT true of Akbar the Great?
    8·2 answers
  • How did the construction of the erie canal support nation building or nationalism
    12·1 answer
  • Suddenly she discovered, in a black satin box, a superb diamond necklace, and her heart throbbed with an immoderate desire. Usin
    6·2 answers
  • Hey guys in the picture below why do you think those pyramid would be so universal? pls write a paragraph!!!
    8·1 answer
  • La grandeza de Roma o la libertad frente a la paz en Maquiavelo
    15·1 answer
  • The ________ were at the bottom of the Sumerian social hierarchy.
    15·2 answers
  • If I died would you care​
    6·2 answers
  • A worker has been struggling at his job. He forgot to tell a coworker that she
    11·2 answers
  • In the 1824 presidential election, Andrew Jackson
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!