Answer and Explanation:
Bradstreet has an aggressive and negative view of the North American indigenous people, he believes that they are savage, violent, uncivilized and that they must be fought in the name of the goals of the English. He believes that the Indians are oppressive and that this should not be tolerated. He believes that the Indians will unite against England and for that reason it is necessary to be prepared. Probably, this view that Bradstreet has towards indigenous people comes from bad experiences he had with the tribes, as well as an imperialist thought full of prejudices and a strong racism and intolerance.
Johnson, on the other hand, although he believes that indigenous people are uncivilized, he believes that working for them will be more profitable for the English, than fighting them. He believes that indigenous people are a fascinating people and that they have dominion over the lands that the English are taking over. Even in the midst of this, the Indians are willing to divide the land and for this they make small demands that can easily be met by the English, establishing harmony with all peoples. Johnson's view comes from the humanistic character and the peaceful nature that he possessed.
I would say Lebanon and Israel. the conflict would be that the lebanon is most likely to get less water because the Jordan River doesn't enter Lebanon. and since majority of the water is going to Israel, that will cause Lebanon to get angry with Israel and most likely to start a huge conflict between the two.
they thought if one country in an area fell to communism the countries surrounding the country would also fall to communism which lead to the red scare.
