With regard to the the text "The Americans: Reconstruction to the 21st Century" the historical development that contributed most directly to the Market Revolution is the emergence and or increase in new forms of transportation.
It is to be noted that the options referenced are unavailable hence the general answer.
<h3>What is the explanation of the above concept?</h3>
A market revolution was revolutionizing American industry and worldwide trade in the 1820s and 1830s. Independent craftspeople were progressively supplanted by factories and mass manufacturing.
Farms flourished and produced items for distant markets rather than local consumers, exporting them via cheap transportation such as the Erie Canal.
The market revolution spurred tremendous economic expansion and increased personal riches, but it also created a rising lower class of property-less laborers and a series of severe depressions known as "panics," trapping many Americans in never-ending cycles of poverty.
<h3>Who benefited the most from the market revolution?</h3>
Most American farmers' living circumstances improved as a result of the market revolution. For example, a mattress that cost $50 in 1815 (when nearly no one possessed one) cost $5 in 1848. (and everyone slept better).
Learn more about Market Revolution in America:
brainly.com/question/14189684
#SPJ1
Towns grew along the canal route, shipping costs between the great lakes and new york were cut to a tenth, and then the second and third choices as well.
Answer: I'm pretty sure it's C. Even a period of only a few decades can greatly change the historical context surrounding an event.
Explanation:
The correct answer is - abolished the boyars.
Peter the Great was not very fond of the situation in which the previous rulers were, where they were heavily dependent on the boyars and also did not had full control of the situation because of them. In order to gain full control and authority in the country Peter the Great decided to abolish the boyars. Instead of the traditional boyar aristocracy, Peter the Great made the state service as the exclusive means of attaining a high position in the bureaucratic system.
The reason why Peter the Great thought that the boyers should be abolished in order for him to strengthen his authority was their influence and power, and he was not wrong. The boyars were the ones that were deciding and controlling the majority of the things in the country. They had very big local influence and power, having their own boyar council as well where they were deciding the politics and economics of the country. Peter the Great did not wanted to be in such a position where other people will decide what should happen in the country and in which manner, as he wanted to be the one that has the only and last say in the matters, so he made his move.
Answer:
idk
IDK what time I get home from the hospital
