Answer:
not permitted : forbidden by authority
Explanation:
for example
The police can arrest anybody found in the vicinity of <em><u>prohibited</u></em> drugs, whether he's an innocent visitor or the real culprit.
The event that will cause tension between the competing values of individualism and rule of law is harsher criminal penalties for use of recreational drugs.
<h3>What is individualism & rule of law?</h3>
This means a theory that favors the freedom of action for individuals over collective control while the rule of law places every one below the power of law.
A tension will be cause between the competing values of individualism and rule of law when there is a harsher criminal penalties for use of recreational drugs.
Therefore, the Option D is correct.
Read more about individualism
<em>brainly.com/question/18405002</em>
#SPJ1
I think it’s the first option.
The Abolition of Slavery
China responded by allowing Western countries in to create trade networks. They continued to have control over agriculture and focused on that part of their country. The larger cities and trading ports came under the control of Western influence. In exchange, European powers in particular Great Britain were willing to militarily defend China.
Japan on the other hand, created trade agreements but with no take over of their cities. They responded with a move to industrialize and create a modern military to defend themselves. Japan made it a goal to become a new "western" power in the East.
