1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
DENIUS [597]
3 years ago
6

Which outcome resulted from the Senate's not guilty verdict in Andrew Johnson's impeachment trial?

History
1 answer:
Tju [1.3M]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

He got outvoted.

Explanation:

On each occasion the vote was 35–19, with 35 senators voting guilty and 19 not guilty. As the constitutional threshold for a conviction in an impeachment trial is a two-thirds majority guilty vote, 36 votes in this instance, Johnson was not convicted.

You might be interested in
PLZZ ANSWER THE QUESTION ​
Semenov [28]

Answer: Pretttyyyy sure it’s the effects of living in a multicultural society. (Don’t quote Tem on that though)

7 0
3 years ago
How does society aim for a fair price
denis23 [38]

Answer:

Fair value is the sale price agreed upon by a willing buyer and seller. The fair value of a stock is determined by the market where the stock is traded. Fair value also represents the value of a company's assets and liabilities when a subsidiary company's financial statements are consolidated with a parent company.

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Which country contains the most southeastern<br> region on the European continent?
forsale [732]

Answer:

cyprus

Explanation:

8 0
2 years ago
Binh is doing a project for social studies. The focus of the project is to compare and contrast the qualities of American and Sw
lbvjy [14]

Answer:

venn diagram and table

Explanation:

i had that question on a quiz

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
SpecitiC RevieW
Aleonysh [2.5K]

Answer:

A. limit free speech.

Explanation:

The first amendment of United States constitution protect the citizens' ability for "Free speech". This law was intended to give the citizens with the power to protest the government. But many people interpret it as the ability to say whatever they want to other people without consequences.

The "clear and present danger' test was devised by the Supreme Court.  The consist of standards that law enforcement can follow to differentiate "Free speech"  and assault.

As a general rule, If the speech that given by a person either threatening the welfare of individuals, disrupt public order, or agitating other individuals to be a target for attack, that speech would no longer be protected by the 1st amendment.

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Explain how 1st Gulf War used the strategy of diplomacy before military action was taken.
    10·1 answer
  • If you value outdoor recreation, which career might be good for you? administrative clerk college football coach adventure trave
    8·2 answers
  • write a 400 word essay on conversation and prevention measures that have been accomplished and the affect they had on the commun
    15·2 answers
  • Help!!
    11·1 answer
  • How did writing Aid the expansion of trade during the Bronze Age​
    12·1 answer
  • 2. Describe at least three differences between the campaigns of William Jennings Bryan and William McKinley.
    12·1 answer
  • Early farmers included the
    8·1 answer
  • How many times did king George iii charge the colonies?
    9·1 answer
  • Which position was South Carolina affirming it declared its intention to secede from the union ?
    15·1 answer
  • What part did John Sutter have in the discovery of gold in California?
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!