To my mind, the answer ( B ) is the inappropriate sentence. In a formal writing informal tone must be avoided as well as colloquial expressions.
Rilke writes about a swan, but the swan could symbolize humankind.
This is because the complete poem by Rilke talks about the swan and how clumsy it could be while walking and also, Rilke compares MAN with the clumsy swan in life as shown in the line “which is letting go/ of the ground we stand on and cling to every day”
<h3>What is Symbolism?</h3>
This refers to the use of words to mean another thing and could be compared to another thing or person to give it a deeper meaning.
Hence, we can see that from the complete poem, there is the narration of the life of swans and how clumsy they could be.
Therefore, we can see that Rilke compares MAN with the clumsy swan in life as shown in the line “which is letting go/ of the ground we stand on and cling to every day”
Read more about symbolism here:
brainly.com/question/2712146
#SPJ1
The evidence that the author used to support faulty analogy in the text is <u>some people talk to their plants to help them grow</u>
According to the excerpt, the narrator talks about plants and hamsters and their similarities and differences. He deceptively compares them by saying that a hamster requires attention from its owner, usually by talking, but plants cando fine without needing anybody to talk to them.
Faulty analogy is a type of fallacy that makes use of deceptive comparisons to attempt to prove a point.
Therefore, the evidence that the author used to support faulty analogy in the text is <u>some people talk to their plants to help them grow</u>
Read more here:
brainly.com/question/4025909
