Answer:
Those states that didn't have or only have small number of slaves. Therefore, mostly states located in the northern part.
Explanation:
According to this compromise, those countries that had many slaves could count only 3/5 on them on census and therefore according to that states were able to sent their representatives in governing bodies.
Those states who had no slaves opposed the idea that slave states can be represented according to the total population, that also included slaves.
The tree levels of sumerian society are Upper class (contained nobles, priests, government officials and warriors), Free man Class (Merchants traders and artisans, and slavery.
The correct answer is A) a higher chance of reelection.
A potential benefit for a government leader using cost-benefit analysis is a higher chance of reelection.
A correct and useful method of decision-making is CBA or better known as cost-benefit analysis. This method is very simple. You compare your advantages to the disadvantages of the decision. You collect the information at hand and then proceed to make the best decision. In 1840, Julies Dupuit who was an Engineer from France started to use this method successfully. That is why is correct to say that a potential benefit for a government leader using cost-benefit analysis is a higher chance of reelection.
