The owner is making this long-run decision based on his rational expectations of economic growth to meet future demands.
<h3 /><h3>What are long term decisions?</h3>
They are a strategic process that means designing an economic scenario based on perspectives, vision and organizational goals, with short-run decisions being the actions present to achieve long-run objectives.
Therefore, the owner is making long-run decisions in line with his expectations for the future of the business by looking at the current economic scenario.
Find out more about long-run decisions here:
brainly.com/question/14522871
#SPJ1
The given statement is False.
Diversity in work groups can create conflicts, so managers should try to minimize diversity when assigning new people to teams, is a False Statement.
Explanation:
Diversity means a whole range of diverse or different things. Diversity can be defined as the state of being diverse. Diversity is a concept which emphasizes that concept that every person is different and unique in his or her own way and we all should respect the differences between people.
People can be considered diverse on the basis of
- Ethnicity
- Race
- Gender
- Age
- Physical Abilities
- Cultures
- Status
- Religion
- Political beliefs, etc.
So when people with diversity come together to work with each other, they may share different opinions on the basis of their different backgrounds and the final result will be a sure success. So managers rather prefer to make teams of people with diversities.
Learn more about diversities at:
brainly.com/question/11427393
brainly.com/question/1446827
#LearnWithBrainly
Answer: No, because State A requires mutuality of parties in order for issue preclusion to apply
Explanation:
According to the information given, the federal court cannot grant the partial summary judgment motion. The reason for this is because State A requires mutuality of parties in order for issue preclusion to apply.
Under 28 U.S.C. § 1738, it's required for the federal court to give full faith and credit to the state court judgments. Therefore, in this scenario, if a subsequent action in the state is barred by the state-court judgment, then it can be deduced that it acts to bar a subsequent action in the federal court too.
