Answer:
Dr Land $146,440
Cr Common stock (3,380 shares×$12 par value) $40,560
Cr Paid in Capital in excess of Par common stock $105,880
Explanation:
Arasota Company Journal entry
Dr Land $146,440
Cr Common stock (3,380 shares×$12 par value) $40,560
Cr Paid in Capital in excess of Par common stock $105,880
A. True. You never know what the smallest detail may have.
Answer:
not me but I'm turning 14.
Answer:
Explanation:
Yes, Disparate Impact Theory can be used in this case relating to the processes of subjective selection such as interrogations. If a discriminatory workplace practice has an unfair and aggressive impact on minorities, it may be in violation of Title VII. Professional individual employees who support on the basis of discretionary judgments without intending to do so are engaging in biased conduct.
The case of Watson V. Fort Worth Bank & Trust will be used to support my claim. Clara Watson turned down a promotion that was contingent on an interview under this scenario.
The U.s. Supreme Court Declared that a Title VII claim to a strategy of subjection enforcement can only be investigated under the unequal care principle. In the majority decision, the Court allowed the principle of (disparate effects) to apply to arbitrarily defined work practices.
