1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
kolbaska11 [484]
2 years ago
13

What is the most likely reason the author used gibberish or nonsensical language in this poem

English
2 answers:
Vikentia [17]2 years ago
7 0
It is
to set up a whimsical fantasy land for readers
Leto [7]2 years ago
5 0
<span>the author used gibberish or nonsensical language in this poem for entertainment</span>
You might be interested in
HELP PLS IT'S A ESSAY AND I'M IN CLASS RN AT LEAST 3 PARAGRAPHS IS NEEDED BUT AT LEAST JUST GIVE ME LIKE 4 SENTENCES OR MORE
Luba_88 [7]

Answer: Ah girl we cant really type essays for you maybe get an idea of what your going to write about

8 0
3 years ago
Inverse of "if you do not understand geometry, then you do not know how to reason deductively”? ​
babymother [125]

This question is missing the options. I've found the complete question online. It is the following:

Which of the following statements is the inverse of "If you do not understand geometry, then you do not know how to reason deductively."?

A. If you reason deductively, then you understand geometry.

B. If you do not reason deductively, then you understand geometry.

C. If you understand geometry, then you reason deductively.

Answer:

The inverse of that statement is:

C. If you understand geometry, then you reason deductively.

Explanation:

To determine the inverse of a statement, we must negate both the hypothesis and the conclusion. In this case, the hypothesis is "if you do not understand geometry." It is already a negative sentence, which means its negation is "if you understand geometry." The same goes for the conclusion "then you do not know how to reason deductively." Its negation is "then you [know how to ] reason deductively." Putting them together, we have "If you understand geometry, then you reason deductively." - letter C

5 0
2 years ago
Why does Govinda turn pale in paragraph 18?
Radda [10]

Answer: Govinda was shocked at Siddhartha's decision and surprised he was ready to begin something new.

Explanation: PLZ Mark me as brainiest im begging u.

4 0
3 years ago
What was Gerald Graff’s main argument in the article?
sladkih [1.3K]

Answer:

Historian of the profession and of the profession’s arguments, influential commentator and spirited critic of the educational practices that havedefined literature and composition classrooms, forceful advocate for the profession in the public sphere—Gerald Graff stands as the profession’s indomitable and indispensable Arguer-in-Chief. In his books Literature against Itself, Professing Literature, Beyond the Culture Wars, and Clueless in Academe, Graff invites all parties—students, teachers, scholars, citizens—to gather where the intellectual action is, to join the fray of arguments that connect books to life and give studies in the humanities educational force.

    Chicago born and educated in Chicago’s public schools and at the University of Chicago and Stanford University, he became John C. Shaffer Professor of English and Humanities and chair of the English department at Northwestern University, then George M. Pullman Distinguished Service Professor of English and Education at the University of Chicago, then associate dean and professor of English and education at the University of Illinois, Chicago. A founder of Teachers for a Democratic Culture, a president of the Modern Language Association, a presence in Chicago-area high schools, a speaker at over two hundred colleges and universities, Graff has taken our profession to task for the gap between academic culture and the students and citizens of our nation. Critic from the City of the Big Shoulders, he has argued compellingly that the strength of our profession resides in the plurality of its voices and the potential of its classrooms to reveal sprawling, brawling democratic vistas.

Francis March Award for Distinguished Service to the Profession of English, Modern Language Association of America, January 2011

   

Graff’s major influence on education, particularly on the classroom practice of teachers, is reflected today in the Common Core State Standards for K-12 schools:

the Standards put particular emphasis on students’ ability to write sound arguments on substantive topics and issues, as this ability is critical to college and career       readiness. English and education professor Gerald Graff writes that “argument literacy” is fundamental to being educated. The university is largely an “argument culture,” Graff contends; therefore, K–12 schools should “teach the conflicts” so that students are adept at understanding and engaging in argument (both oral and written) when they enter college. . . .            —Appendix, “The Special Place of Argument in the Standards”

Graff’s argument that schools and colleges should respond to curricular and cultural conflicts by “teaching the conflicts” themselves is developed in such books as Professing Literature (1987; reprinted in a 20th Anniversary edition in 2007), which is widely regarded as a definitive history, and Beyond the Culture Wars (1992).   His idea also inspired a series of “Critical Controversies” textbooks which Graff co-edited with James Phelan.

In Clueless in Academe (2003) Graff analyzed (in the book’s subtitle) “how schooling obscures the life of the mind,” and argued that schools and colleges need to demystify academic intellectual culture for all students, not just the high achieving few.  This book led Graff and his wife Cathy Birkenstein to publish a writing textbook, They Say/I Say: The Moves That Matter in Academic Writing (2006), which continues to set records for adoptions by colleges and high schools.  Graff (and now Graff and Birkenstein) has given hundreds of invited lectures and workshops, and his work has been the topic of three special sessions at MLA conferences and part of a special issue of the journal Pedagogy.  Graff served as the President of MLA in 2008.

Explanation:

3 0
2 years ago
HURRYYYYWhich detail most belongs under the "Both" heading
krek1111 [17]

Answer:

Aare aggressive

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • It is the same!—For, be it joy or sorrow,
    7·2 answers
  • How did Shakespeare achieve an elevated social status?
    10·2 answers
  • What is andre Agassi's biography called
    7·2 answers
  • DOUBLE POINTS!! Discuss at least one theme or characteristic of romanticism using examples from poetry in that era. Will give BR
    5·1 answer
  • Which sentence uses punctuation correctly?
    12·2 answers
  • Then sentence whose subject is the subject of the whole paragraph is the topic sentence,thesis sentence,controlling idea, or sen
    7·1 answer
  • Do you think August should go to school or not? RACE PARAGRAPH (WONDER)
    10·2 answers
  • What is the imact of economic decisions,political outcomes,and moral reasoning
    5·1 answer
  • Which of the following contrasts can be made between the father and Hofus?
    14·1 answer
  • Can only certain types of character develop theme? Why or why not?
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!