1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
damaskus [11]
3 years ago
14

How did Europe and the United States respond to the Japanese invasion and massacre of Manchuria in 1931?

History
1 answer:
Airida [17]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

Both the United States and Europe did nor support the actions of Japan, they made it clear that they did not recognize any agreement Japan must have entered that resulted to the Invasion of Manchuria.

Explanation:

In response to Japan’s invasion of Manchuria in 1931, the United States  and Europe publicly explained that both their government did not agree with The actions of Japan

The U.S. Secretary of War, Henry Stimson, made a moral statement about Japan’s invasion of Manchuria in 1931. The statement stated that the United States refused to or “recognize any agreement, or situation” that Japan may have been involved in due to  the invasion.

With the invasion attracting the  great international attention, the League of Nations presented  the Lytton Commission, British politician Victor Bulwer-Lytton who was in charge at the time, was to analyse the situation, with the organization making its findings in October 1932.

You might be interested in
The "Red Shirts" are associated with what period of South Carolina history
Nana76 [90]
The "Red Shirts" are mostly associated with the period that followed after the Reconstruction era of the United States of America. Although they were present from the year 1875 but they became most active after the Reconstruction era. So it can be said that during the late 19th century the "Red Shirts" were most active.
4 0
3 years ago
True or false ?
soldier1979 [14.2K]

True

The Articles of Confederation were a disaster. While the framers of the Articles intended for the federal government to be weak, they made it so weak to the point that a rebellion started!

One of the biggest flaws in the Articles was that it did not require state governments to give the federal government any funding. Because of this, the states refused to give the federal government any funding whatsoever. As a result, a national army could not be created because of lack of funding.

On top of not being able to pay for a national army, the federal government could not pay for any of its debts either. Because America had just gone through a Revolutionary War, the federal government (and state governments) were swamped in debt from all the borrowing during the battles.

Because states had so much debt, they would refuse to give any money to the federal government, which in turn could not pay off their debts either. States began imposing heavy taxes on their citizens, and even began taking land from people. It became so bad that a grassroots rebellion known as Shay's Rebellion began. Luckily, it was quelled before it became too dangerous.

Shay's Rebellion helped the Framers realize that there was something seriously wrong with the Articles. They held a Constitutional convention and ratified the current Constitution that we have today. In the Constitution, the federal government is significantly stronger than that of the federal government in the articles. While some people still argued for a weak federal government (Antifederalists), the people who supported a strong federal government (Federalists) won.

- T.B.

3 0
3 years ago
“Where justice is denied, where poverty is enforced, where ignorance prevails, and where any one class is made to feel that soci
amid [387]
Ill help you as best as i can! :)
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What is the name of the native people who lived in puerto rico before the arrival of christopher columbus?
mart [117]
<span>The name of the native people who lived in Puerto Rico before the arrival of Christopher Columbus were the Taínos.</span>   <span>To add, <span>the </span>Taíno<span> <span>were an Arawak people who were the indigenous people of the Caribbean and Florida. At the time of European contact in the late 15th century, they were the principal inhabitants of most of Cuba, Jamaica, Hispaniola (the Dominican Republic and Haiti), and Puerto Rico.</span></span></span>
7 0
3 years ago
Why is population size important for a war effort?
Korolek [52]

Answer:

Ulysses S Grant was an american soldier and the Commanding General of the Army. He led the union army to take over the confederacy during the civil war when the confederate states wanted to not be a part of the U.S. He was also the 18th president of the United States.

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Which of the following people lives a lifestyle most similar to the mongols lifestyle before the rise of genghis khan
    5·2 answers
  • Which best describes how the pharaohs’ used art and architecture? for decoration for functional purposes for celebrations for mi
    12·2 answers
  • Which important third-party in Texas today supports welfare reform, federal deficit reduction, and term limits?
    11·2 answers
  • Why was Détente so important in bridging the gap between capitalism and communism?
    8·1 answer
  • Which city did Mohammad return to and declare the holiest city in islam?
    7·1 answer
  • What does the term American dream mean to you? write it in your own words.
    7·1 answer
  • PLS HELP ME WRITE ESSAY FOR HISTORY​
    12·1 answer
  • Explain how Buddhism diffused after the Tang Dynasty
    5·1 answer
  • How did king von get into a fight with quondo rondo?
    8·1 answer
  • 11
    15·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!