1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
gladu [14]
4 years ago
10

Only the rich, landowning men are allowed to vote in an election.

Social Studies
2 answers:
tatyana61 [14]4 years ago
7 0
If this is a true/false type question then true only the rich were allowed to vote in the election back in maybe like the 1800's

miskamm [114]4 years ago
4 0
Is this a True or False question? If so I would say False
You might be interested in
A good example of a positive feedback mechanism would be ________.
Mrac [35]

Answer

A blood clotting or blood pressure.

Explanation:

Platelet aggregation and accumulation in response to injury is an example of positive feedback.

Platelet aggregation is the clumping combined of platelet in blood. Or you could say that it's the sequence of events leading to the formation of a clot.

8 0
3 years ago
What did the economy of the middle colonies heavily relied on?
Nookie1986 [14]

Answer:

The Middle Colonies had much fertile soil, which allowed the area to become a major exporter of wheat and other grains. The lumber and shipbuilding industries were also successful in the Middle Colonies because of the abundant forests, and Pennsylvania was moderately successful in the textile and iron industries.

Explanation:

hope this helps!

7 0
4 years ago
What does the Preamble promise to do for the people of this country? How has it succeeded, and how has it failed?
Advocard [28]

Answer:

The Preamble of the U.S. Constitution—the document’s famous first fifty-two words— introduces everything that is to follow in the Constitution’s seven articles and twenty-seven amendments. It proclaims who is adopting this Constitution: “We the People of the United States.” It describes why it is being adopted—the purposes behind the enactment of America’s charter of government. And it describes what is being adopted: “this Constitution”—a single authoritative written text to serve as fundamental law of the land. Written constitutionalism was a distinctively American innovation, and one that the framing generation considered the new nation’s greatest contribution to the science of government.

The word “preamble,” while accurate, does not quite capture the full importance of this provision. “Preamble” might be taken—we think wrongly—to imply that these words are merely an opening rhetorical flourish or frill without meaningful effect. To be sure, “preamble” usefully conveys the idea that this provision does not itself confer or delineate powers of government or rights of citizens. Those are set forth in the substantive articles and amendments that follow in the main body of the Constitution’s text. It was well understood at the time of enactment that preambles in legal documents were not themselves substantive provisions and thus should not be read to contradict, expand, or contract the document’s substantive terms.  

But that does not mean the Constitution’s Preamble lacks its own legal force. Quite the contrary, it is the provision of the document that declares the enactment of the provisions that follow. Indeed, the Preamble has sometimes been termed the “Enacting Clause” of the Constitution, in that it declares the fact of adoption of the Constitution (once sufficient states had ratified it): “We the People of the United States . . . do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.”

Importantly, the Preamble declares who is enacting this Constitution—the people of “the United States.” The document is the collective enactment of all U.S. citizens. The Constitution is “owned” (so to speak) by the people, not by the government or any branch thereof. We the People are the stewards of the U.S. Constitution and remain ultimately responsible for its continued existence and its faithful interpretation.

It is sometimes observed that the language “We the People of the United States” was inserted at the Constitutional Convention by the “Committee of Style,” which chose those words—rather than “We the People of the States of . . .”, followed by a listing of the thirteen states, for a simple practical reason: it was unclear how many states would actually ratify the proposed new constitution. (Article VII declared that the Constitution would come into effect once nine of thirteen states had ratified it; and as it happened two states, North Carolina and Rhode Island, did not ratify until after George Washington had been inaugurated as the first President under the Constitution.) The Committee of Style thus could not safely choose to list all of the states in the Preamble. So they settled on the language of both “We the People of the United States.”

Nonetheless, the language was consciously chosen. Regardless of its origins in practical considerations or as a matter of “style,” the language actually chosen has important substantive consequences. “We the People of the United States” strongly supports the idea that the Constitution is one for a unified nation, rather than a treaty of separate sovereign states. (This, of course, had been the arrangement under the Articles of Confederation, the document the Constitution was designed to replace.) The idea of nationhood is then confirmed by the first reason recited in the Preamble for adopting the new Constitution—“to form a more perfect Union.” On the eve of the Civil War, President Abraham Lincoln invoked these words in support of the permanence of the Union under the Constitution and the unlawfulness of states attempting to secede from that union.

The other purposes for adopting the Constitution, recited by the Preamble— to “establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity”—embody the aspirations that We the People have for our Constitution, and that were expected to flow from the substantive provisions that follow. The stated goal is to create a government that will meet the needs of the people.

Explanation:

Your welcome

6 0
2 years ago
The home of George Washington is Mount ________ ________ of Paris.
mafiozo [28]
Mount Vernon estate.......
3 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Psychoanalysis, as freud developed it, was a form of what we now would call:
OLEGan [10]
Outpatient Therapy :)
8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Gabriel just moved to the United States and was surprised by the angry emotional outbursts of others he commonly witnessed on th
    9·2 answers
  • Rachel's parents are building a new house for their family. They want to design their house to minimize pollution. Which option
    13·2 answers
  • Someone help meeee pleaseee
    13·2 answers
  • A soccer team of 4th graders is down 2-0 at halftime. Their coach says, "I want to see some fire in your belly. You have to want
    6·1 answer
  • Which enlightened ruler am I?
    5·2 answers
  • Which term implies that a married couple is living independently and away from both sets of in-laws?
    6·1 answer
  • What might you find in a Paleolithic cave? List items from the cave and the purpose of each in the chart below. Help last one
    5·1 answer
  • A _____________ is a group of people with a shared identity and culture (a nation) who possess their own territory and state gov
    6·1 answer
  • 1) What modern day country was home to the Aztecs?
    15·1 answer
  • Is it possible that all elements of an Ecosystem stay in balance with each other?if yes,what do we call such an ecosystem
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!