C is the answer to problem
Answer:
a. Cherry-picking of evidence
Explanation:
Cherry-picking: The term "cherry-picking" is also referred to as "fallacy of incomplete evidence" or "suppressing evidence" is described as the specific act of pointing or denoting to individual data or cases that seem to withstand or confirm a specific position while avoiding an important part of similar and related data or cases that tends to contradict that particular position.
Example: Resumes.
In the question above, the given statement represents "cherry-picking of evidence" as the correct answer.
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Although the question does not provide options, we can say the following.
The syndrome is the Presidential assassination syndrome.
Lee Harvey Oswald was the material author of the assassination of US President JF Kennedy. He killed the President on November 22, 1963, in Dallas, Texas. The US federal governed opened the Warren Commission to investigate the case. Oswald was interrogated and after so many investigations, the commission stated that he was the only author of the assassination. But just a few believed this version, open to the idea of many conspiracies, including Cuban Communists, the CIA, and organized crime.
Neither ageing nor sentence type as assumed in a debate is not a factor in desistance but getting convicted is. Conviction is the trigger for desistance. If<span> offenders were convicted for the crimes they committed, crime would definitely be reduced.</span><span> </span>
<span>False. Oracle bones were used by the Chinese to tell what will happen about the future. This were used by the diviners who would want to know the future of the weather, their crops, the fortunes of the members of a royal family, among others. The questions are carved onto bones or shells then heat is applied until thermal expansion causes it to crack which is eventually interpreted by the oracle.<span>
</span></span>
