Answer is citizens participation in lawmaking
Depends on your view, this is an opinion-based question, so there is no right or wrong answer.
Here is my opinion: I think that the U.S should have declared war to Mexico. First, I believe that Texas was a territory that belonged to the U.S, as Mexican General Antonio Lopez signed a treaty that gave the U.S the right to annex Texas. Furthermore, most people that lived in Texas wanted to be part of the United States. Like democracy given to those in the Kansas-Nebraska territory years later, to decide whether they should be a free state or a slave state, the people should decide what they want to do with their state.
Second, I hold the view that the war is rational because expansionism is done in peaceful ways, but Mexico refused to be peaceful and immediately resorted to war. President James Polk wanted to expand the U.S, but Mexico refused to give up Texas. Today, we have Texas as a result of this war.
"I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States."
Answer:The churches at Lindisfarne was the preeminent middle of Christianity within the kingdom of Northumbria. The occasion sent tremors all through English Christendom and stamped the starting of the Viking Age in Europe. Viking; Lindisfarne Strike Viking ships arriving in Britain as delineated in an English enlightened original copy. Lindisfarne Strike. Lindisfarne Strike, (June 8, 793), Viking attack on the cloister of Lindisfarne ( Sacred Island ), off the northeast coast of Britain at Northumbria, that sent shockwaves through Anglo-Saxon Britain and the Christian West and which is prevalently cited as the starting of the Viking Age in Britain. It was a triumphant day for men who took cruise to the West, but for Christians, it was very the inverse. Their pioneers accepted that the Viking Attack on Lindisfarne was sent to Britain by God to rebuff individuals for their wicked lives and interminable wrongdoings.
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Although there are no options attached we can say the following.
The protections that were built into the Charter of the Medieval Town of Lorris, France for the tenant or homeowner were the following.
The King was very interested in the protection of the people of France in that they were "the motor" of the economy of the Middle Ages.
The French small towns had active participation in the economy of the kingdom and had to be protected in those dark ages of the centuries 11th and 12th.
In this case, the charter of Lorris, France, was granted by King Louis VII. The year: 1155.
The charter included important articles such as that the inhabitants of Lorris only needed to pay "sixpence" for their homes and for each acre of land they owned. The charter clearly said that nobodu¿y could force the people to pay extra taxes. People were forced to travel far away to the degree they could not return home on the same day. People were exempted to pay tolls when they crossed the regions of Orleans, Milly, or Etampes. People could not be arrested when they were working in the markets. The only exception was if they were disturbing the peace of the place.
