The statement is True. The communication and technological revolution that promotes and enables the globalization of culture has eliminated the preservation of cultural diversity.
Cultural diversity is set appreciating that society is made of many distinct corporations with special pursuits, talents, competencies and. Wishes. It additionally means that you realize that human beings in society can have different religious ideals and sexual orientations to you.
It facilitates dispelling negative stereotypes and private biases about specific companies. Similarly, cultural diversity helps us apprehend and appreciate “approaches of being” that are not always our personal. In order as we engage with others, we will build bridges to consider, respect, and know-how across cultures.
There are generally four different types of range: inner, outside, organizational, and worldview—and also you must purpose to recognize and constitute all of them.
Learn more about cultural diversity here brainly.com/question/25671025
#SPJ4
B. promote racial equality. Saying that “the time for discrimination is over” implies an end to racial inequality is coming. This statement definitely doesn’t back up any of the other points. Saying discrimination is over can only mean one thing, the promotion of racial equality.
<em><u>He served the Sigismound Bathory</u></em>
Answer:
Reasons for irrational behaviour : Political brand name establishment in favour of candidate, enhancing brand loyalty towards.
More knowledgable public : Would value candidate working on real development, rather than mere brand name.
Explanation:
Political elections are determined by the public's impressions of the candidates rather than the candidates' views on the issues.
Reason(s) of such irrational voting behaviour could be : The candidate having established a personal brand image of himself/ herself, specially in a particular community group. This makes the people of the community being 'brand loyal' towards their candidate, irrespective of his or her ideologies. It is also possible to make that political personality (candidate) an important part of 'national image' or 'community leader image', which reinforce support for the candidate, irrespective of person perception and attitudes.
If public were more knowledgeable about factors that affect person perception and attitudes : The political support would not be based on lineaged political brand names. It would rather be earned on the basis of candidate's performance for socio - economic, political upliftment. This would give power in the hands of deserving politicians & create a message that 'real work' & not just 'name' is needed to gain political success
There is no define you just have to think
