Answer:
<h3>As the standards of cleanliness have risen, there is more cleaning to do at home.</h3>
Explanation:
Ruth Schwartz explains that individuals want to live in a cleaner environment due to the high marginal utility of living clean and healthy. People have come to understand that clean and healthy lifestyle have great benefits and, therefore, has raise their standard of cleanliness.
In this regard, many new technologies and products like vacuum cleaner, the washing machine, and other household appliances have been capitalized in the market.
However, she also concludes that these products and technologies which have been introduced to ease work at home for women have actually increased the number of hours that women spend on housework as standards of cleanliness and keeping household environment healthy has become very important. Thus, making women engaged in household cleaning for longer periods.
Well, for #1 what changed in the graph is in '08 the number of goods went down and in 01 and 02 goods went up so goods had better business in 01 and 02. Hope this helps!
Answer:
Limitation in Lorenzo's method of research is Option B: It is likely to be time-consuming.
Explanation:
The limitation of the research includes the fact that only one female out of 1500 which are of age group 25-35 have breast cancer. As age increases, the cases for breast cancer increase.
So, if Lorenzo uses this method of age bracket to understand correlation between the age and incidence of breast cancer, it would be time consuming as he needs to research for each group separately and then conclude.
Option D is incorrect as it says that participants would drop out. Option C about cohort difference is also incorrect as cohort differences research means people who born are of same age group share common experience but in this case research is being done on different age groups.
Answer:
the ans is:
Explanation:
Guayaquil Conference, (July 26–27, 1822), meeting between Simón Bolívar and José de San Martín, leaders of the South American movement for independence from Spain. Late in 1821, when San Martín’s campaign for the liberation of Peru was faltering, he wrote to Bolívar, whose army was then in possession of Ecuador, that the two of them must join forces if the struggle for independence was to succeed. Bolívar agreed enthusiastically, and the two met at Guayaquil, Ecuador, but they failed to agree. Both men had eagerly anticipated their first encounter, but their mutual respect and common cause did not obscure their rivalry. The flamboyant and self-assertive Bolívar stood in sharp contrast to the reflective and self-effacing San Martín.
