Answer:
1) Odoacer used his popularity with his troops to overthrow the emperor.
Explanation:
In the words of J. B. Bury, "[The <em>foederati</em> desired to have roof-trees and lands of their own, and they petitioned Orestes to reward them for their services, by granting them lands and settling them permanently in Italy". Orestes refused their petition, and they turned to Odoacer to lead their revolt against Orestes. Orestes was killed at Placentia along with his brother Paulus outside Ravenna. The Germanic <em>foederati</em>, the Scirians, and the Heruli, as well as a large segment of the Italic Roman army, then proclaimed Odoacer <em>rex Italiae </em>("king of Italy"). In 476 Odoacer advanced to Ravenna and captured the city, compelling the young emperor Romulus to abdicate on 4 September.
Saying that, Odoacer didn't assassinate Romulus, nor did he start a long and bitter civil war.
Choice 3 doesn't say anything about overthrow so that one is also out, leaving Choice 1 as the answer to this very thoughtful question.
He changed the cause of the war to a moral issue. Before the civil war was fought mainly for states rights but when the Emancipation Proclamation was issued freeing slaves the war became a moral issue therefore prohibiting Britain from supporting the Confederacy because they recently freed their own slaves and did not support slavery.
The main way in which a desire to build a stronger nation might affect a ruler's decision to become a protestant or a catholic is because he or she would want to "become" the religion that is favored most in the country, as to eliminate any political dissent by the people.
Answer:
It kept one side from having to much power in congress
Explanation:
I don't know how to really explain it
Answer:
It's considered a threat because people nationwide die from it.
Explanation:
Hope this helps
God bless you
-Kayla
