I say Israel - and I hope this is taken in an utterly nonpartisan way, which takes absolutely no position vis-a-vis the legitimacy of either conservatism or the Israeli state. I just think some core aspects of Israeli government and society are in line with mainstream US conservatism: a free-market liberal democracy of course, but with formal religious-ethnic affiliation, compulsory military service with training on firearms (and licensing to possess same) for all citizens, and a generally hawkish stance on questions of military and defense. They are also highly security-oriented, some would say in a much more effective way than the US government, and its security apparatus employs profiling techniques which almost undoubtedly have a racial component (<span>and </span><span>conservatives would no doubt want to insist that these two facts are directly related). I believe that taxation rates are roughly on par with that in the US, if not a bit less... though not nearly as low as Switzerland. </span>
Answer: Stephen F. Austin
Explanation: Stephen Fuller Austin (November 3, 1793 – December 27, 1836) was an American empresario. Known as the "Father of Texas" and the founder of Texas, he led the second, and ultimately, the successful colonization of the region by bringing 300 families from the United States to the region in 1825.
As Churchill claimed, the Soviet Union didn’t
desire a war, but instead, they wanted to acquire the fruits of war and an
unlimited expansion amount.
To add, Sir
Winston Leonard Spencer-Churchill was a British politician who served as
the Prime Minister of the United Kingdom from 1940 to 1945 and again from 1951
to 1955.
Answer:
3, 2, 4, 5, 1
Explanation:
sorry if thats wrong but i tried good luck
Answer:
D. Leaders believed the government shouldn´t interfere in people´s lives
Explanation:
