<span>Foreign firms should seek this sorts of alliances, because making them is a good way to obtain knowledge of local markets; contrast this to a foreign firm attempting to start up a branch on their own, perhaps in the form of a greenfield venture. They would potentially have to figure out local market conditions from scratch, whereas a local company would potentially have years of successful experience and knowledge already at their fingertips.</span>
Answer:
correct option is $750
Explanation:
solution
we know here that Net balance of opening accounts receivable is
Net balance of opening accounts receivable = $30000 - $500
Net balance of opening accounts receivable = $29500
and
Credit sales during the year is here $7500
0
and Cash payments received = 74550
so
uncollecectible account expenses = credit sales × % of sale uncollectible
so uncollecectible account expenses = $75000 × 1%
uncollecectible account expenses = $750
so correct option is $750
Answer: False
Explanation:
The price elasticity of supply measures the change in quantity supplied when the price changes.
The basic trend is that when price increases, quantity supplied increases as well. The reverse is true.
Price elasticity of supply = %Change in quantity supplied / % change in price
0.5 = -6% / Change in price
0.5 * Change in price = -6%
Change in price = -6% / 0.5
= -12%
The statement above is therefore false because price should have reduced by 12% for quantity supplied to reduce by 6%
Answer:
1. What was the product's operating income(loss) last year = $90,000 loss
2. What is the product's Break even point in unit sales and dollars
• Break even sales in units 18,000
• Break even i n sale dollars $1,260,000
3. Maximum annual profit given an increment of 5,000 units and reduction of sales price per unit by $2.
• Net profit of $20,000
4. What would be the break even point in unit sales and dollars using the selling price that you determined in requirement 3.
• Break even sales units 19,285.7
• Break even in sales dollars $1,311,427.6
Explanation:
Please see attached detailed solution to the above questions and answers.
Explanation:
The management of Boulders Mall made use of the media to offer an apology for what happened in the shopping center, making it clear that there was not actually an act of discrimination due to the way the man dressed in traditional Ndebele clothes dressed and clarifying that in no case At the time, man was discriminated against because of his culture or his traditions.
This was a public way of "calming" the controversies and upsets that could have been generated in many people, because we must remember that this type of action can generate rejection by the community towards the shopping center and generate great economic losses.
