Answer: Yes, because the helicopter manufacturer assumed the risk of the failure of the contract.
Explanation:
Based on the scenario given in the question, the subcontractor will likely prevail because the helicopter manufacturer assumed the risk of the failure of the contract.
Here, when the helicopter manufacturer entered into the contract with the subcontractor, the manufacturer was aware that the helicopters will be used in the "severely war-torn region.
In this case, the subcontractor wasn't aware of the information that the manufacturer knew of and therefore wasn't able to determine the risk that was involved in the contract.
Answer: (1) 120,675
(2) 60,450
Explanation:
(1) Nominal GDP, year 2 ($) = Sum of (Year 2 price × Year 2 quantity)
= 150 × 4.50 + 1,200 × 100
= 675 + 120,000
= 120,675
(2) Real GDP, year 2 ($) = Sum of (Year 1 price x Year 2 quantity)
= 3 × 150 + 50 × 1200
= 450 + 60,000
= 60,450
When one keeps paying only the minimum amount, they will find getting out of debt harder because:
- More interest will accrue on the balance left
When a person pays the minimum balance that they are supposed to pay on a loan, they will be leaving a larger portion of money to be paid back.
This amount will accumulate interest such that the debt will keep increasing because the interest needs to be paid back as well.
In order to get out of debt faster, it is recommended that you pay higher than the minimum because this would reduce the amount that interest is charged on which means that you would owe less interest.
In conclusion, paying the minimum balance leads to more interest accumulating which makes getting out of debt difficult.
<em>Find out more at brainly.com/question/13711677.</em>
These are called in kind benefits or benefits in kind. They are benefits which are given to employees or directors from their company. However, these are not included in their salary wages. They are also called perks or fringe benefits and they include things like company cars, medical insurance, and cheap loans.<span> </span>
Since you gave no table,
her federal income in 14 % Rate = 14 % x 2,100
= $ 294
Her federal tax in 16 % Rate = 16 % x 2,100
= $ 336