The correct answers are A) Arraignment refers only to answer to a criminal charge. B) During an arraignment, a defendant enters a plea of guilty or not guilty. D) Arraignment requires the presence of a judge.
The reasons why there is no process of arraignment in a civil court case are the following: Arraignment refers only to answer to a criminal charge, during arraignment a defendant enters a plea of guilty or not guilty, and arraignment requires the presence of a judge.
The first stage of criminal proceedings based on the courtroom is the Arraignment Process. First is the arrest, then the booking, followed by the bail. Then the criminal court reads the charges of the defendant. It informs that if the defendant does not have a lawyer, the court can get it a court-appointed lawyer. Then the defendant declares himself guilty or not guilty, and pays the respective bail.
John Smith Was a man that helped the survival of Jamestown .He became friends with the Natives and they shared food
Answer:
It Helped Britoch rule in india
Explanation:
British rule in India had both negative and positive effects on India. British rule brought Western technology that improved medicine, transportation, warfare, and production of goods. This also helped advance in technology increased population and food production in India, benefitting everyone.
Answer:
As Chief Justice of the United States, John Marshall felt property rights should not be empowered.
Explanation:
As the longest serving Supreme Court of the United States, Marshall dominated the court for more than three decades and played an important role in the development of the American legal system. The most remarkable thing about this is that, particularly in the famous Marbury v. Madison judgment, he upheld the principle that federal courts are required to exercise the right to review. For example, alleged laws could be disregarded if they violate the Constitution. In this way, Marshall was able to anchor the judiciary in the United States as an independent and influential branch of the state. In addition, the Marshall Supreme Court issued a number of important decisions with regard to federalism. It touched on the balance of power between the federal government and the states during the early years of the nation. In particular, he repeatedly confirmed the supremacy of federal law on state-level laws. He also supported a broad interpretation of the so-called enumerated powers.
Some of his decisions received little support from the general public. Nevertheless, Marshall worked on the development of the third branch of the federal government and strengthened the federal level in the name of the Constitution.
Are there any answer choices do you have a picture
