3 years ago

Time value Personal Finance Problem Jim Nance has been offered an investment that will pay him $500 three years from today.

Business

1 answer:

MatroZZZ [7]3 years ago

8 0

Answer:

a. $ 408.16

b. $408.16

c. Higher rate of return

Explanation:

a. Present value of $500 three years from today would be calculate by using the formula P V = 500 / (1+0.07)^3 = 408.16

b. Jim should pay not more than $408.16 to purchase this payment now.

c. If Jim can purchase this investment for less than the amount calculated in part (a), it means that the rate of return that he will earn is higher than the opportunity cost.

You might be interested in

Joel and Liza are having a disagreement over one of their stock investments, which just lost 15 percent in a short period of tim

anastassius [24]

B.

It says Liza is risk tolerant, therefore it would make sense that she would hold on to these stocks as risk tolerant people often hold onto stocks in the long term.

8 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Q3. List three factors that are an impediment to traditional Barter System in papua New Guinea<br>

Butoxors [25]

Answer:

The biggest challenge is PNG

4 0

3 years ago

Use the starting balance sheet and the list of changes to create an updated balance sheet and to answer the question.

anastassius [24]

Answer: $3,300,000

Explanation:

Accounting formula:

Assets = Equity + Liabilities

Total equity and liabilities on March 31 is:

= Beginning balance - decrease in liabilities + Increase in Equity

= 5,000,000 - 100,000 + 400,000

= $5,300,000

Assets therefore has to be $5,300,000 on the same date.

Assets = New cash balance + Other assets

5,300,000 = (2,200,000 - 200,000) + Other assets

Other assets = 5,300,000 - 2,000,000

= $3,300,000

4 0

3 years ago

Fiona and her fellow Green Committee members are studying the effects of the use of energy-efficient light bulbs. Which of these

Kamila [148]

The correct answer is B.) Hope this helps!

3 0

3 years ago

A 60-year-old man develops lung cancer, and sues the manufacturer of an asbestos-containing material. The man worked in construc

Artyom0805 [142]

Answer:

Weak because of proximate cause is difficult to prove in absence of other similarly affected individuals

Explanation:

Since in the question it is mentioned that the 60 year old man have a lung cancer so he sues the asbestos manufacturer also he trust that it is unsafe as her friend who use the alternative material has not have a lung cancer so here the case would be weak as of proximate cause as it is difficult for proving it

Therefore the same is to be considered

8 0

3 years ago

Time value Personal Finance Problem Jim Nance has been offered an investment that will pay him ​$500 three years from today.

Time value Personal Finance Problem Jim Nance has been offered an investment that will pay him $500 three years from today.