Answer:
sale of a new share of stock to an individual investor
Explanation:
Securities are created in the primary market. With an IPO which stands for initial public offering, new stocks are sold to the public by companies on a first time basis.
The sale of a new share of stock in the question is an example of a primary market transaction.
<span>As of 2016, the biggest penalty OSHA can hand out for each willful violation is $126,000. The largest amount previous to that was $70,000. The maximum amount OSHA can collect for repeated violations is also capped at $126,000 as of 2016. OSHA stands for Occupational Safety and Health Administration, and operates as an official agency of the US Department of Labor.</span>
Answer:
Proposal A
3.75 years
Proposal B
3.375 years
Explanation:
<u>Proposal A</u>
Payback = 3.75 years
Year Cash Inflow Initial Investment Balance Year Count
0 0 1,050,000
1 $280,000 770,000 1
2 $280,000 490,000 2
3 $280,000 210,000 3
4 $280,000 0 *3.75
* 1050,0000 / 280,000 = 3.75 years
<u>Proposal B</u>
Payback = 3.375 years
Year Cash Inflow Initial Investment Balance Year Count
0 0 1,050,000
1 $350,000 700,000 1
2 $3150,000 385,000 2
3 $280,000 105,000 3
4 $280,000 0 *3.375
* ( 3 + ( 105,000 / 280,000 ) ) = 3.75 years
Answer:
$32,600
Explanation:
Calculation to determine her itemized deduction if she used the proceeds of the second loan to finish the basement in her home and landscape her yard
Using this formula
Itemized deduction =(Financing amount * 6 percent)+(Additional amount borrowed*interest rate of 8 percent)
Let plug in the formula
Itemized deduction=( $350,000 * 6 percent)+($145,000 *8 percent)
Itemized deduction=($21,000+$11,600)
Itemized deduction=$32,600
Therefore her itemized deduction if she used the proceeds of the second loan to finish the basement in her home and landscape her yard wi be $32,600
Answer: Please refer to Explanation.
Explanation:
Two Companies. We shall call them A and B.
If A and B decide not to advertise, they both get $5,000,000.
If A advertises and B does not then A captures $3 million from B at a cost of $2 million meaning their payoff would be,
= 5 million - 2 million + 3 million
= $6 million.
A will have $6 million and B will have $2 million as $3 million was captured from them. This scenario holds true if B is the one that advertises and A does not.
If both of them Advertise, they both reduce their gains by $2 million while capturing $3 million from each other so they'll essentially both have just $3 million if they both decide to advertise.
With the above scenarios, it is better for both companies to ADVERTISE if there is NO COLLUSION. This is because it ensures that they do not get the lowest payoff of $2 million if the other company decides to advertise and they do not.
However, if they DO COLLUDE. They must both decide that NONE of them SHOULD ADVERTISE and this would leave them with their original $5 million each which is a higher payoff than the $3 million they will both receive if they were both advertising.
