Answer: whats not to like?
Answer:
If only one person has the authority to rule, then no one else, even members of government, may have authority, so divine right undermines civil society.
Explanation:
The Divine Right to Rule was the kingship theory developed sometime between 16th to 18th century. This idea suggested that Kings and Queens were chosen by the divine call from God. This theory was a fallacy developed to justify the monarchy. This right to rule formalized absolute monarch, which means no intereference from parliament or members of government. The proponent of the Divine Right to Rule in England was James 1.
<u>The tyrannical rule of monarch in the name of Divine Right to Rule made people think of new idea to govern. This age of new ideas was called Enlightenment. The Enlightenment thinkers were in oppose of this rule and believed that if only one person would have the authority to rule, then it would be injustice to the civil society</u>.
Thus the correct answer is option First.
What exactly do you mean to ask
Answer: Washington made the office of the presidency powerful by appointing a cabinet and proposing major legislation to Congress. But at the same time he defined practices that emphasized the republican character of the position. His actions in office set a precedent for a strong executive branch and a strong central government.
Explanation:
The most important of the given above would be the separation of power. While the last one would be consent of governed. Separation of powers is an act of vesting the legislative, executive, and judicial powers of government in separate bodies.
