False.
Empty chair technique is a method used in Gestalt therapy.
<h3>What is the empty chair technique?</h3>
It is a gestalt therapy technique where the client engages in an emotional dialogue with a part of themselves or a significant someone (such as a parent) who is pictured as sitting in an empty chair during the session. The client then switches places with the other and assumes that part or that other person. These days, the two-chair technique is another name for this method.
This simple method is intended to help you resolve any internal or interpersonal disagreement. It enables you to view the problem from a fresh angle and develop understanding of your thoughts, feelings, and actions.
Learn more about gestalt therapy here:
brainly.com/question/8004115
#SPJ4
Answer
could not be incorporated by the Fourteenth Amendment
Explanation
Due process are the steps that the government must take to ensure that the rights are protected. In the constitution the steps to due process are the 4th amendment which protects people from unlawful searches and seizures which means that police have no right to search you without a warrant. then the 5th amendment which imposes restrictions on governments prosecution of persons accused of crimes. It prohibits self incrimination. The 6th amendment which guarantees rights of criminal defendants which includes the right to public trial without unnecessary delay. And the 8th amendment which states that Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted. The due process could not be could not be incorporated by the Fourteenth Amendment this is because the Fourteenth Amendment has had a profound impact on American jurisprudence.
Answer: humanistic
Explanation:
Humanistic philosophy and values reflect a belief in human dignity and science, , this approach allows an psychologist to focus on ways to help improve an individual's self-image or self-actualization.
Answer:
This case involves a federal death sentence imposed on defendant-appellant Fields for conviction of a federal capital offense. Fields was sentenced to death largely on the basis of the opinion of a psychiatrist who stated that he could confidently predict Fields would be dangerous in the future.
Explanation:
