Answer: 2,200 units.
Explanation:
The complete exercise is:
A manufacturer shipped units of a certain product to two locations. The equation above shows the total shipping cost T, in dollars, for shipping c units to the closer location and shipping f units to the farther location. If the total shipping cost was $47,000 and 3,000 units were shipped to the farther location, how many units were shipped to the closer location?
Given the following equation:
You know that "T" is the total shipping cost (in dollars), "c" is the number of units shipped to the closer location and "f" is the number of units shipped to the farther location.
Based on the information given in the exercise, you can identify that, in this case:
Then, knowing those values, you need to substitute them into the given equation:
And finally, you must solve for "c" in order to calculate the number of units that were shipped to the closer location.
You get that this is:
Answer:
$44,377
Explanation:
Note: The answers (options) attached this question belongs to another question
Particulars Amount
Salaries ($48,000*1,200/3,500) $16,457
Depreciation ($24,000*$102,600/$270,000) $9,120
Advertising ($47,000*$346,000/$865,000) <u>$18,800</u>
Total <u>$44,377</u>
In classical conditioning, the Neutral Stimulus (NS) becomes a Conditioned Stimulus (CS) after it reliably signals the impending occurrence of the Unconditioned Stimulus (US).
The conditioned stimulus (CS) is a neutral stimulus (NS) that - after being repeatedly presented before the unconditioned stimulus - evokes a similar response as the unconditioned stimulus (US).
For example, a cat staring at a can of food (unconditioned stimulus) reacts differently to the sound of a can opener being struck on any surface (neutral stimulus). But if you condition a cat to believe that striking a can opener on any surface signals it will eat a can of food, the neutral stimulus becomes the conditioned stimulus.
Learn the difference between classical and operant conditioning here: brainly.com/question/17583598
#SPJ4
Answer:
The tax consequences of the distribution to Montclair in 20X3 would be a $150,000 gain recognized and a reduction in E&P of $175,000.
Explanation:
The distribution company distinguishes profit on the distribution, which is included in E&P netting of tax and decreases E&P by rhe lands fair market value fewer the liability believed by the shareholders.
Therefore, The tax consequences of the distribution to Montclair in 20X3 would be a $150,000 gain recognized and a reduction in E&P of $175,000.
Answer:
All factors influencing supply other than price of the commodity.
Explanation:
Supply shifters are all factors influencing supply (other than price of the commodity) such as relative price, level of technology, cost of production, weather, future price expectations, number of producers, natural disasters, government policy and aims of the producer. These factors can shift supply either to the left or right.
