Answer: They are both right.
Explanation:
Firms in every market will always maximise profit where their Marginal Revenue equals Marginal Cost because at this point, resources are being fully utilized. This is therefore no different in a Perfectly competitive market so Skip is correct.
Peggy is also correct however because in a Perfectly Competitive market, the demand curve is perfectly elastic. This creates a situation where the Price, Marginal Revenue and Average Revenue are all the same and represent the demand curve as well.
With the Price being the same as the Marginal Revenue in a Perfectly competitive firm, that means that where the Price equals Marginal Cost is where the Marginal Revenue equals Marginal Cost as well so indeed perfectly competitive firms maximize profit where price equals marginal cost.
Answer: Modern portfolio theory takes this idea even further. It suggests that combining a stock portfolio that sits on the efficient frontier with a risk-free asset, the purchase of which is funded by borrowing, can actually increase returns beyond the efficient frontier.
Risk premium is defined as excess return over risk free rate by taking extra risk. A risk-free asset has zero risk, so risk premium on these assets is zero. As risk level of investment increases, risk premium on investment also increases.
The market risk premium is the difference between the expected return on a market portfolio and the risk-free rate. The market risk premium is equal to the slope of the security market line (SML), a graphical representation of the capital asset pricing model (CAPM). CAPM measures required rate of return on equity investments, and it is an important element of modern portfolio theory and discounted cash flow valuation.
Explanation:
Answer:
$147,500
Explanation:
Computation of Napa's dividends-received deduction
Napa is said to holds less than 20% stock interest in KLP Inc which means that the dividends received deduction in the case of dividends received from KLP would be 50%.
And in case of dividends received from Gamma, the dividends received deduction would be 100% reason been that KLP holds more than 80% of the stock interest in Gamma.
Hence:
Napa’s dividends-received deduction will be:
= ($55,000 x 50%) + $120,000
=$27,500 +$120,000
= $147,500
Therefore Napa's dividends-received deduction will be $147,500
Financial responsibility can be shopping or buying stuff from stores.
