Answer:
is this a essay question beacuse dont do those
Explanation:
Ayuda como cambio de idioma a la aplicación sin que me tenga que cambiar de cuenta
Answer: <em>Please refer to Explanation</em>
Explanation:
1. The fish in the river are considered <u>rival in consumption</u> and <u>non-excludable</u> whereas the fish in the private stream are <u>rival in consumption</u> and <u>excludable</u>.
When a good is said to be Rival in Consumption, it means if it is consumed by one person first, another person cannot get it which reduces their chances of getting the same good. Once Eric consumes or catches a fish, no one else can catch that fish which means fishing is a Rival in consumption activity.
When a good is said to be Excludable, it means that people can be prevented from accessing the good of they have not paid for it. The pond on Eric's property is private so people cannot just come in and fish. It is Excludable. Non-Excludable on the other hand is the inverse and means people who have not paid can access the good like the river in town.
2. In other words, the fish in the river are example of <u>common resource </u>and the fish in the private stream are an example of <u>private good</u>.
Common resources are available to everyone as they are in the public domain like the fish in the river. Private goods however are not in the public domain and ate meant to be accessed by only certain people like the private stream which is only accessible by Eric's family or whoever they want to have access to it.
3. Fishing in the river will likely lead to the <u>tragedy of commons</u> because of which of the following reasons?,
B. anyone can fish in the river, and one person's fishing activity decreases the ability of someone else to fish with success.
The Tragedy of the Commons is an Economic explanation of the situation whereby people who have easy access to a resource such as the river in this instance, are able to use it with little cost to them. This might lead to a situation where they use it to the detriment of others because they will fish more and this will reduce the amount of fish left for others.
Answer:
$7,500
Explanation:
A few points must be considered in order to calculate ther realized gain.
1. Although Robert's stock in Lebec Corporation was $15,000 at cost, it was sold to Karen (his sister and related party) for $8000. Since it is related party transaction, the loss of $7000 ($15,000-$8,000) cannot be reported as a loss.
2. Karen's basis for the stock is $8000 (the amount she bought it from her brother).
3. Karen sold the stock to Dana for $15,500. The realized gain since Dana is not related is $15,500-$8,000= $7,500. This becomes the realized gain since it is an unrelated party transaction.
Canceling a contract for a technicality when market prices are falling is considered a perfectly acceptable and ethical practice. An escalator clause provides for an increase, as well as a decrease, in price if costs change.
The market price rate is the modern-day fee at which an asset or provider can be sold or offered. The marketplace rate of an asset or provider is decided with the aid of the forces of delivery and demand. The fee at which the quantity provided equals the amount demanded is the marketplace charge.
A market charge is a charge triumphing on a specific day or a particular time. it is the end result of marketplace call for and delivery. regular charge, then again, is the end result of a lengthy length call for and lengthy length delivery. marketplace expenses are based upon the interplay of call for and delivery. An equilibrium price is a balance of demand and supply factors.
To take a marketplace charge instance, allow's count on an inventory has bid prices as much as $24.99 and ask prices at $25.01 and above. whilst an investor places a marketplace order to shop for it's going to execute at $25.01. This becomes the marketplace charge and bids will want to transport up to complete the following exchange.
Learn more about market prices here: brainly.com/question/1490249
#SPJ4