Answer:
True. As a former US Lawyer, Senator and the 7th President of the United States of America, Andrew JAckson championed this idea of the president being in charge of the national policy issues rather than leaving it in the hand of the Congress.
Explanation:
He is known as the peoples president due to the series of policies he initiated like the support of individual liberty, the policy that caused the forced migration of the native Americans etc.
His use of the veto power is also another way which he demonstrated the idea that the president rather than congress should take the lead in national policy issues. A typical example is the bill on the bill through Congress to re-charter the second bank of America (institution) which he vetoed (the rejection of the bill) because it encourages the advancement of the few individual at the expense of other citizens. :) can i get brainiest!
Answer:
There are a couple of things that can occur:
1)The bill would be struck down by votes in either the House of Representative (HR) or in the Senate (S).
- If the bill does not garner enough support or votes, the vote will die in the the corresponding house.
2) The bill will be veto and/or line veto by the President.
- The bill would be automatically vetoed, which would be returned to both houses to be passed if they get 2/3 votes in each congress. Line veto can be used when they pass the bill but WOULD NOT enforce PARTS of the law.
3) Law is declared Unconstitutional.
- The third branch of government, the Supreme Court, can void the law and declare the law unconstitutional.
4) Popular Opinion: On certain occasions, Citizens of the US can try Direct Democracy, in which if they gather enough signatures or supporters, they can force the government to reconsider their choice.
~
<span>Peacetime differs from wartime production. The two groups that cooperated with government to switch to wartime production must have saw the need to do so. However, without sufficient information, I don't know which are the two groups. However, these groups probably saw that things were heated.</span>
Answer:
Trade unions in Africa have received a great deal of attention from various labour analysts, especially in regard to their contributions to the struggles against neoliberalism during the harsh time of structural adjustment programs. The kingdom of Swaziland (recently renamed as Eswatini) has constantly been faced with persistent labour unrests associated with increased demands for democratic openness (Simelane, 2016).
Locating trade union activism along these lines suggests that unions are neither delinked from the state nor regional or global institutions. Thus, as a way of consolidating their strategies, they make use of various public spaces, either at the local or international level to raise their grievances and issues. Like most of the civil society organisations, they can demonstrate leverage (capacity and power) to engage institutions at different geographical levels. This engagement shapes their strategies and practices as well as the various roles that trade union actors play in regional governance.
Answer:
Shared information, increased resource use, and organized government limited resource use.