Answer:
koneksyon
Explanation:
dahil Dito makikita kung gani ka katipid
Answer:
The answer is "choice a"
Explanation:
In the given question the missing choices is added in attached file please find it.
The additional output produced through hiring an extra item of such an input reflects the marginal product (MP). For the very first time. for example, its marginal labor productivity was increased output generated by recruiting additional work.
This law diminishing marginal returns as more as units that even the marginal result of even an input, that is hired input.
In other words, any additional work input would generate less than a previous employee because recruiting additional workers decreases expected revenue on jobs, the laid-off of employees, which means the Labor would grow expected revenue.
In Japan is laying off fewer employees even despite the slowdown it continues to produce strong outputs. The lower-priced revenues and their work remain constant along with their steady overall performance.
Your medium product (total) item divided by total work would stay intact. United states staff layover to the other side. It laid-off the staff equals higher marginal labor for overall returns it's going to be higher production besides that, lower labor in the United States could mean an increase in the gross labor output but a larger for Japan, more then, that's why the choice a is correct.
Answer:
See the attached table for answer.
Explanation:
Answer:
"A" option is correct
Explanation:
In this case, the other party didn't agreed to the exchange of any commodity. Its one sided, which is not enforceable by law. Also for these 10,000 Joanne is exchanging nothing.
It would be enforceable if Lila wanted to give 10,000 to Joanne in exchange of some commodity or product. With out exchange from other party its not enforceable.
Answer:
Total loss= $4,745
Explanation:
Giving the following information:
Coronado Inc. has an investment in trading securities of $150000. This investment experienced an unrealized loss of $7300 during the current year. Assuming a 35% tax rate.
Loss= 7,300
Tax savings= (7,300*0.35)= (2,555)
Total loss= $4,745