1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Maksim231197 [3]
3 years ago
10

Assignment: What is Important? (30 points) Criterion Exemplary (27-30 points) Proficient (23-26 points) Emerging (18-22 points)

Not Evident (below 18 points) Score and Comments PURPOSE: Examine theme and author’s purpose in a literary work. Points Possible: 8 Student identifies author's purpose and theme accurately, and gives accurate, detailed evidence to explain how they are similar/different. Student identifies author's purpose and theme, and gives some evidence to explain how they are similar/different. Student identifies author's purpose and/or theme and gives little evidence to explain how they are similar/different. Student fails to identify author's purpose and/or theme, and does not explain how they are similar/different. Score: Comments: DRAW CONCLUSIONS Draw conclusions and make inferences of implied information using textual support as evidence. Points Possible: 8 Student draws clear conclusions and makes astute inferences of implied information using appropriate textual support as evidence. Student draws adequate conclusions and makes informed inferences of implied information using textual support as evidence. Student draws conclusions and makes inferences of implied information using textual support as evidence. Student fails to draw conclusions or make inferences of implied information using textual support as evidence. Score: Comments: THEME Analyze recurring theme. Points Possible: 8 Student identifies an accurate shared theme and gives detailed textual evidence to explain how each piece demonstrates that theme. Student identifies an accurate shared theme and gives some textual evidence to explain how each piece demonstrates that theme. Student identifies a shared theme and gives little textual evidence to explain how each piece demonstrates that theme. Student fails to identify an accurate shared theme or give textual evidence to explain how each piece demonstrates that theme. Score: Comments: Mechanics/Conventions Points Possible: 6 Student presents writing that is free of grammatical or spelling errors. Student presents writing that has or 3 or fewer errors in grammar or spelling. Errors do not interfere with understanding. Student presents writing that has 4-8 grammar/spelling errors. Errors interfere with understanding. Student presents writing that has more than 8 grammar/spelling errors. Errors interfere with understanding. Score: Comments: ( 150 words for the 3 subjects Purpose,draw conclusions,theme) Will give brainliest max points and very thankful.
English
1 answer:
Olegator [25]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

Explanation:

Themes are often what make a story memorable. Long after reading a story, we may forget the characters’ names or the plot, but we will always remember what we learned from reading the story. That lesson is what we call the theme in literature. Living a simple life leads to greater personal freedom. Themes are built on the understanding that life experiences are common to all of us. Readers build connections to stories through universal themes. Appearances can be deceiving. True friends are hard to find.

the writer’s overall purpose determines the techniques he or she uses. The writer’s

reason for writing a particular article or book may be manipulative, as in propaganda

or advertising, or may be more straightforward, as in informative writing. In either

case, understanding the writer’s underlying purpose will help you interpret the context of the

writing. It will also help you see why writers make the decisions they do—from the largest

decisions about what information to present to the smallest details of what words to use. The

chapter concludes with instructions on how to write an analysis of purpose and technique. This

kind of rhetorical analysis will provide the perspective required to keep you from being pushed by

words in directions you don’t want to go.

You might be interested in
All the other male pigs on the farm were porkers. The best known among them was a small fat pig named Squealer, with very round
sleet_krkn [62]

Answer:

The details show why other animals might believe anything Squealer says.

Explanation:

The details of the text show that Squealer was a very charismatic pig. In addition to speaking in a very admirable way, he enchanted people with his way of acting, walking and swinging. This made Squealer convince people of anything he wanted. He was so persuasive that they could convince people to believe even lies.

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Is this a fact or opinion: Rabbits have sensitive digestive systems.
Talja [164]
This is a Fact.
Hope this helps!
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Read the following excerpt from Levitt and Dubner’s Freakonomics. There is a tale, “The Ring of Gyges,” that Feldman sometimes t
liubo4ka [24]

Answer:

Feldman reaches the conclusion that most people are honest without receiving an incentive by

studying a counterclaim about morality and arriving at a broad generalization.

Explanation:

A researcher can reach a conclusion that most people are honest after studying a counterclaim about morality.  He can then arrive at a broad generalization.

A counterclaim is the opposite of an argument, or simply, the opposing argument.  A counterclaim research is one undertaken to establish that the opposite of a research situation prevails.  It is a claim made against a situation or an established position in order to rebut the claimed position.

In this instance, Glaucon had taken a position that no man could resist the temptation of evil if he knew his acts could not be witnessed or dictated.  For Feldman to contradict this claim, with a conclusion that 87% of the time, a man could resist the temptation of evil even if he knew his acts could not be witnessed or dictated because he had become invisible, it means that he had researched the counterclaim.

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Someone plz help me :(
Brut [27]
D is the answer I took the test
5 0
2 years ago
“The wind was angry that day, as it demolished my hair-do.” What rhetorical device is being used in this sentence?
Alexeev081 [22]

Answer:

b

Explanation:

cuz brudda

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Select the correct answer.
    11·1 answer
  • Which of the following is not a type of hook that is often used in persuasive pieces, such as the poems "If," "Can't," and "Pers
    5·1 answer
  • Is the underlined clause independent or subordinate? Mr. Wilets is a teacher whom we all admire.
    7·1 answer
  • Hi. I need help.
    8·1 answer
  • Help please! T-T . . . . .
    10·2 answers
  • How does As I Lay Dying most meet the definition of Modernist literature?
    6·2 answers
  • 10 Which of the following is an example of a secondary source?
    10·1 answer
  • HURRY!!
    5·1 answer
  • What is your label as an introvert?
    9·2 answers
  • 3 While the eruption of Mount St. Helens was a shock to Jamie, it did not shock
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!